Re: [Qucs-devel] Re: ASCO

[asco d. <as...@gm...>]

Hello Stefan,

On 5/15/06, Stefan Jahn <st...@gr...> wrote:
...
> Hm.  I think e.g. (S11_rms_mag + S11_rms_ph / 180) may be a good weight.
> What do you think?

Well, my experience tells me that S11 can be good while other fail
miserably. This tends to happen around the oscillation frequency when
it is necessary to de-embed parasitics. But, you might have a
different opinion.

Now I'm thinking in something like
(S11_rms_mag + S11_rms_ph / 180) + (S12_rms_mag + S12_rms_ph / 180) + ...

But I will only be sure once I try it. This is in my opinion one good
example for both QUCS and ASCO.


>
> Stefan.


Regards,
Jo=E3o Ramos