From: Andrew S. <wac...@go...> - 2013-01-23 21:50:45
|
On 20/01/13 17:10, quc...@li... wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > We are now building a new team to get Qucs back on the road, at least > the activity has been boosted. > A couple new people are working on it now (I am also new). > I have to get a little more familiar with the way the simulator works, I > have now concentrated on the Qt4 part. > It seems like you know what you are talking about, why don't you join us? > > Frans > Hi Frans, Sorry about the delay responding. I've been laid out with an evil cold for a few days. Joining the team sounds fun but with two young kids, a working partner and non-trivial day job I'm not sure I can make any commitments about any kind of sustained contributions. I'm afraid I know only enough about Newton-Raphson solver based circuit simulation and numerical analysis to know that I don't know much at all ;-). I'm a C++ EDA verification/synthesis tooling guy who ended up doing some time architecting SoC's more or less 'by accident'. However, I would like to get a cosimulation interface up and running. Regards, Andrew PS Whats the state of the MOSFET Models in Qucs? Some quick tests with a circuit using a MOSFET to switch a diode-clamped inductive load produced some pretty weird behaviour. I can't yet rule out a oops in my circuit - if I get a moment I'll try to cross-check both on SIMetrix - but it looked damn strange. Trying the same MOSFET in a flyback converter model that produce beautiful "classical" wave with ideal switches also behaved very strangely with a MOSFET replacing the switch. |