You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(17) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(23) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(45) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(53) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(60) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(53) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(54) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(60) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(46) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(90) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(85) |
Dec
(74) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(59) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(104) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(109) |
Oct
(101) |
Nov
(117) |
Dec
(57) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(42) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(41) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(52) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(20) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(34) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(60) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(20) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2026 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(8) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-02-09 16:59:40
|
Bugs item #1656248, was opened at 2007-02-09 08:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1656248&group_id=12740 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Error in cashflowvectors if a single cash flow exists Initial Comment: Version: 0.3.14 File: cashflowvectors.cpp Error if a forward starting bond is created and the start date is Saturday and the maturity date is on the following Monday. SCHEDULE only create one cash flow date. Routines ends with an error on row with Date start = schedule.date(0), end = schedule.date(1); My Fix: int indxend = (schedule.size() <= 1) ? 0 : 1; Date start = schedule.date(0), end = schedule.date(indxend); Best regards Thomas Karlström EMAIL: tho...@fr... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1656248&group_id=12740 |
|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@gm...> - 2007-02-09 16:25:01
|
Hi all, I've made candidate tarballs for next release---you can see them listed at <http://quantlib.org/prerelease/>. Please try them and see if they cause any problems on your machines; if nothing relevant is reported, I'll make the release in a week or so. Note: you can download the tarballs from the page above, but the http connection is quite slow. If you have a Sourceforge account, you can retrieve them via SSH instead; use the command (one single line if my mailer or yours wraps it) scp jr...@sh...://home/groups/q/qu/quantlib/htdocs/prerelease/QuantLib-0.4.0.tar.gz . by replacing jrandom with your SF username and QuantLib-0.4.0.tar.gz with whatever archive you want to retrieve. (I don't know if scp is standard on Windows---it shouldn't be hard to find an SCP client anyway. If not, use http.) Thanks, Luigi ---------------------------------------- Steinbach's Guideline for Systems Programming: Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-02-04 14:13:59
|
Feature Requests item #1651713, was opened at 2007-02-04 06:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=362740&aid=1651713&group_id=12740 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Extension to ROOT Initial Comment: I´m a CERN ROOT user, but not very skilled on C++, so I thought it would be great to have a Quantlib extension to this environment. Just a suggestion... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=362740&aid=1651713&group_id=12740 |
|
From: Prabhu R. <pr...@ae...> - 2007-02-03 05:23:40
|
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Wang <jo...@gn...> writes:
Joseph> 1) I'm trying to do a three dimension plot in which the x,
Joseph> y, z axes are not symmetric (i.e. x and y are percentages
Joseph> and z is in dollars). What is the easiest way of doing
Joseph> that.
Not sure how that works. VTK is unit agnostic AFAICT. You can change
the axes labels to reflect the units but thats the best *I* can think
of. You could rescale the data or any actors you view or transform
the input data to scale things. You can lie about the text that your
axes show etc. So there is usually a way to do what you are looking
to do. The best way is really domain dependent.
Joseph> 2) I'm using vectorize to vectorize a python function that
Joseph> makes a call to C++. However it doesn't seem to have
Joseph> function attributes available. Thoughts on how to do
Joseph> that?
No idea. That is a numpy question. Are you saying that your
vectorized function does not have function attributes available or
that your wrapped c++ function does not?
Joseph> 3) I'd like to make the impedance mismatch between things
Joseph> like QuantLib arrays and numpy arrays as seemless as
Joseph> possible. Any words of wisdom on how to do this?
I don't know anything about QuantLib arrays so will shoot in the dark
here. If your arrays can take or provide a block of contiguous memory
that is interpreted according to a particular data type then I think
it is easily possible to get these two array types talking to each
other. However doing this right and optimally will take a bit of
effort (I've done this for tvtk which lets VTK and numpy arrays talk
to each other seamlessly). I think there is a fair bit of
documentation on the scipy wiki on the various ways to do this right.
The scipy-user list is a good place to ask for pointers since the
folks who actually develop numpy and do all sorts of things with numpy
arrays are on that list and will be happy to answer questions.
Joseph> 4) The thought occurs that we can get pretty nice
Joseph> interactivity by somehow using Python traits with the
Joseph> QuantLib quote object. Python traits (which have nothing
Joseph> to do with C++ traits) are extended attributes of a python
Joseph> object which can be connected to a UI and take care of
Joseph> things like notification processing. The QuantLib quote
Joseph> object is a container for a quantity that could change.
Joseph> The idea would be to somehow wrapper the Quote object with
Joseph> Python traits, which would allow one to interactively
Joseph> control things like interest rates and see how that
Joseph> affects surfaces.
Yes, in fact tvtk does just this. It wraps *all* of VTK with a fancy
traits interface. This is documented in tvtk/doc/README.txt and the
actual business of how this is automatically done for ~900 VTK classes
is documented in the devel.txt in the same directory.
HTH.
cheers,
prabhu
|
|
From: Toyin A. <toy...@ho...> - 2007-02-02 16:26:26
|
Hi All, I have uploaded 3 new training videos (over 2.5 hours of new video viewing content) demostrating vanilla and exotic option pricing (including building, sorting, grouping and pricing portfolios of vanilla and exotic option deals within the CapeTools QuantTools XL library). I have also copied up a video that demostrates building stochatic process objects as well as grouping stochastic objects within a correlated stochastic array and conducting two types of montecarlo simulations using the correlated stochastic array. Furthermore, once the simulation objects has been created, there are further functions to query the object for the simulated paths as well as applying custon payoffs within Excel. Finally, the simulation demo presents an introduction to the montecarlo generic pricing framework. For those of you who are familiar with QuantLib's stochastic process and simulation classes, you should find this particular video easy going as the objects used are based directly on these quantLib classes. In fact within the video, we make several references to QuantLib's documentation. You can view these free training videos from www.QuantTools.com. Simply navigate to the Download/Screenshot -> Training Videos link within the menu. New videos are : Pricing (vanilla and exotic option pricing) : Duration 57 minutes Portfolio Pricing (vanilla and exotic option portfolio manipulation and pricing) : Duration 43 minutes Simulation (for equity type underlyings) : Duration 57 minutes We have also updated the CapeTools QuantTools XL library to v2.0.5. Basically we have fixed quite a few bugs that we ourselves have found and those found by some of our users. Please see details on the site for what has changed. Enjoy, Best Regards, Toyin Akin. CapeTools QuantTools. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Hotmail is evolving check out the new Windows Live Mail http://ideas.live.com |
|
From: Gheury E. \(DBB\) <edm...@de...> - 2007-02-02 12:55:54
|
Hi all, I recently ran into some troubles using the quantlib MC pricing classes. 1. stochasticprocess: drift and diffusion are currently timestep independent. For instance, providing the timestep could lead to a more accurate drift, as already stated in blackscholesprocess.hpp. Is there something preventing the implementation of this idea by adding a third parameter "dt" in the drift and diffusion prototype in stochasticprocess.hpp ? Should I send a code submission for this ? 2. Use of historical data for path dependent pricing in MC. I read in the TODO page that negative values usage in the TimeGrid class should be investigated. While I thought of using negative values in the TimeGrid at first for historical data, I finally decided not to do it because TimeGrid seemed to be oriented toward the MC simulation process involving the path *generators*. Therefore, I decided to take historical data into account in the PathPricer class by merging the historical data and generated path into a homemade class. The passing of historical data to the path pricer is made through derived Instrument::arguments classes. The solution I implemented is still a a very early devlopment stage but could be separated as follows: the use of a historical class for historical process values (already exists: TimeSeries) and the use of a class that merge historical data and the generated Path/MultiPath class at the object construction. Does this seem to be a good idea (or at least not too bad idea) ? Are there better ways to achieve this ? Best regards, Edmond =09 -------------------------------------- Dexia Bank disclaimer : http://www.dexia.be/maildisclaimer.htm --------------------------------------=20 =20 |
|
From: Joseph W. <jo...@gn...> - 2007-02-01 04:56:28
|
I'm starting to get "hello world" results with mayavi. I was able to calculate option prices in QuantLib and plot the surfaces using tvtk. A few questions: 1) I'm trying to do a three dimension plot in which the x, y, z axes are not symmetric (i.e. x and y are percentages and z is in dollars). What is the easiest way of doing that. 2) I'm using vectorize to vectorize a python function that makes a call to C++. However it doesn't seem to have function attributes available. Thoughts on how to do that? 3) I'd like to make the impedance mismatch between things like QuantLib arrays and numpy arrays as seemless as possible. Any words of wisdom on how to do this? 4) The thought occurs that we can get pretty nice interactivity by somehow using Python traits with the QuantLib quote object. Python traits (which have nothing to do with C++ traits) are extended attributes of a python object which can be connected to a UI and take care of things like notification processing. The QuantLib quote object is a container for a quantity that could change. The idea would be to somehow wrapper the Quote object with Python traits, which would allow one to interactively control things like interest rates and see how that affects surfaces. I should have more neat plots in the next week or so. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joseph Wang Ph.D. - jo...@gn... China Derivatives Researcher and Software Developer - QuantLib http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Roadrunner |
|
From: Joseph W. <jo...@gn...> - 2007-02-01 04:52:03
|
Turns out that I had a moment to check the patch the files and check them in to HEAD. Thanks. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joseph Wang Ph.D. - jo...@gn... China Derivatives Researcher and Software Developer - QuantLib http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Roadrunner |
|
From: Joseph W. <jo...@gn...> - 2007-02-01 04:37:20
|
Yikes. That option problem is nasty. I've fixed that in HEAD. It may take me a few days to go through the other= =20 patches. Thanks!!! =D4=DA Tuesday 30 January 2007 15:20=A3=AC=C4=FA=D0=B4=B5=C0=A3=BA > Joe, > > In the course of playing with QuantLib we've found some problems with > the Java compilation of the QuantLib-SWIG project. > > We've made some modifications to the configuration files, please see > the attached patch. > Would be great if this can be included into the HEAD of the > QuantLib-SWIG project. > The diffs are based on the QuantLib-SWIG-0.3.14 release, and i don't > think there have been any changes to the relevant files since the > release. > > The patch file expects there to be a directory QuantLib-SWIG-0.3.14 > and the changes to be made in a dir called > QuantLib-SWIG-0.3.14_java_patch. However, you can just run it with > 'patch -p1 < quantlib-swig_java_ver_1.6-head.patch' in the HEAD of > QuantLib-SWIG and it'll apply the changes. > > Also, it seems that there's a discrepancy with the SWIG/options.i file > and the way the Option.Type enum is defined. I think the current file > in the HEAD of SWiG/options.i has the values reversed - the > Quantlib option.hpp file has it this way at > http://quantlib.cvs.sourceforge.net/quantlib/QuantLib/ql/option.hpp?revis= io >n=3D1.41&view=3Dmarkup enum Type { Put =3D -1, Call =3D 1 }; > while the SWIG/options.i is > enum Type { Call =3D -1, Put =3D 1}; > I took the liberty of flipping it to look like the option.hpp file in > the patch as well. > > The patch file also contains a small test program Hello.java that does > a basic sanity check to make sure the created Java library works. > And it expects the variable JAVA_HOME to be declared and pointing to > the location of the JDK, and tries to place the generated java wrapper > library into the lib/ directory under the JRE. > > hope this helps. please let me know if you need me to change anything, > or if things don't work for you. > > On 1/29/07, Joseph Wang <jo...@gn...> wrote: > > The SWIG bindings usually lag the Quantlib libraries a bit, but since I > > need to use them, I've been trying my best to sync them up. I'm working > > mainly with the Python and R binding, so if there is anything broken in > > the other bindings, let me know and I'll try to fix them. =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D----- Joseph Wang Ph.D. - jo...@gn... =20 China Derivatives Researcher and Software Developer - QuantLib http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Roadrunner |
|
From: Joseph W. <jo...@gn...> - 2007-01-31 23:59:20
|
I got a hello world plot that interfaces QuantLib with tvtk I was wondering if there are any volumetric quantities in QuantLib that would be worth ploting? Running with ipython -wthread import scipy import numpy import QuantLib # prepare some interesting function: surface = QuantLib.TestSurface() x = scipy.arange(-7., 7.05, 0.1) y = scipy.arange(-5., 5.05, 0.1) # 3D visualization of f: from enthought.tvtk.tools import mlab fig = mlab.figure() s = mlab.SurfRegular(x, y, scipy.vectorize(lambda x, y:surface(x,y))) fig.add(s) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joseph Wang Ph.D. - jo...@gn... China Derivatives Researcher and Software Developer - QuantLib http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Roadrunner |
|
From: Toli K. <to...@ma...> - 2007-01-30 21:21:56
|
Joe, In the course of playing with QuantLib we've found some problems with the Java compilation of the QuantLib-SWIG project. We've made some modifications to the configuration files, please see the attached patch. Would be great if this can be included into the HEAD of the QuantLib-SWIG project. The diffs are based on the QuantLib-SWIG-0.3.14 release, and i don't think there have been any changes to the relevant files since the release. The patch file expects there to be a directory QuantLib-SWIG-0.3.14 and the changes to be made in a dir called QuantLib-SWIG-0.3.14_java_patch. However, you can just run it with 'patch -p1 < quantlib-swig_java_ver_1.6-head.patch' in the HEAD of QuantLib-SWIG and it'll apply the changes. Also, it seems that there's a discrepancy with the SWIG/options.i file and the way the Option.Type enum is defined. I think the current file in the HEAD of SWiG/options.i has the values reversed - the Quantlib option.hpp file has it this way at http://quantlib.cvs.sourceforge.net/quantlib/QuantLib/ql/option.hpp?revision=1.41&view=markup enum Type { Put = -1, Call = 1 }; while the SWIG/options.i is enum Type { Call = -1, Put = 1}; I took the liberty of flipping it to look like the option.hpp file in the patch as well. The patch file also contains a small test program Hello.java that does a basic sanity check to make sure the created Java library works. And it expects the variable JAVA_HOME to be declared and pointing to the location of the JDK, and tries to place the generated java wrapper library into the lib/ directory under the JRE. hope this helps. please let me know if you need me to change anything, or if things don't work for you. On 1/29/07, Joseph Wang <jo...@gn...> wrote: > The SWIG bindings usually lag the Quantlib libraries a bit, but since I need > to use them, I've been trying my best to sync them up. I'm working mainly > with the Python and R binding, so if there is anything broken in the other > bindings, let me know and I'll try to fix them. |
|
From: Joseph W. <jo...@gn...> - 2007-01-29 18:22:43
|
The SWIG bindings usually lag the Quantlib libraries a bit, but since I need to use them, I've been trying my best to sync them up. I'm working mainly with the Python and R binding, so if there is anything broken in the other bindings, let me know and I'll try to fix them. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joseph Wang Ph.D. - jo...@gn... China Derivatives Researcher and Software Developer - QuantLib http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Roadrunner |
|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@gm...> - 2007-01-26 08:33:42
|
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 15:38 -0600, Joseph Wang wrote: > Has anyone else had problems with long compile times for QuantLib-SWIG python. > It's taken over a day for me on a AMD64 1 Gig machine. Try modifying the compiler flags so that they do NOT include "-g". Later, Luigi ---------------------------------------- What is written without effort is, in general, read without pleasure. -- Samuel Johnson |
|
From: Joseph W. <jo...@gn...> - 2007-01-25 21:39:04
|
Has anyone else had problems with long compile times for QuantLib-SWIG python. It's taken over a day for me on a AMD64 1 Gig machine. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joseph Wang Ph.D. - jo...@gn... China Derivatives Researcher and Software Developer - QuantLib http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Roadrunner |
|
From: Bianchetti M. <mar...@ca...> - 2007-01-25 09:46:38
|
My opinion is that the set up "1 list + filters" allows a good balance between speed of sub/unsub and information managing, and as such it could be promoted in the community (mail + website). Ciao Marco > -----Original Message----- > From: qua...@li...=20 > [mailto:qua...@li...] On Behalf=20 > Of Ferdinando Ametrano > Sent: 24 January 2007 19:23 > To: Luigi Ballabio > Cc: eric ehlers; qua...@li... > Subject: Re: [Quantlib-dev] ObjectHandler/QuantLibAddin branch >=20 >=20 > I personally don't mind since I've setup my filters to split the > traffic originating from different modules. >=20 > I'm not against having different mailing lists, but having just one > mailing list instead of 6 is better for sub/unsub. >=20 > We could ask this question on QuantLib-CVS >=20 > thank you >=20 > ciao -- Nando >=20 > On 1/24/07, Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 01:00 +0100, eric ehlers wrote: > > > previously ObjectHandler and related projects were migrated out of > > > QuantLib into separate SourceForge projects, this led to=20 > some problems > > > and it was agreed to migrate all the code back into the QL CVS > > > repository. > > > > Hi all, > > with regard to this, do people (this means you!)=20 > prefer that commit > > logs for all modules go into the QuantLib-cvs mailing list,=20 > or should we > > direct the XL-related ones to another list? Should we ask on the > > QuantLib-cvs mailing list? > > > > Later, > > Luigi > > > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > I hate quotations. > > -- Ralph Waldo Emerson > > > > > > > >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the=20 > chance to share your > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -=20 > and earn cash > >=20 > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge &CID=3DDEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > QuantLib-dev mailing list > Qua...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDE V _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list Qua...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-25 08:28:56
|
Bugs item #1643611, was opened at 2007-01-24 16:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lballabio You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1643611&group_id=12740 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 1 Private: No Submitted By: nom_de_plume (nom_de_plume) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 30/360US Day Count Convention Initial Comment: If Date1 = 30 Dec 2005 and Date2 = 31 Dec 2005 Then the day count fraction returns 0? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luigi Ballabio (lballabio) Date: 2007-01-25 09:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75450 Originator: NO Ok, I'm closing the report ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nom_de_plume (nom_de_plume) Date: 2007-01-25 07:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1700464 Originator: YES On seconds thought, this is not a bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1643611&group_id=12740 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-25 06:48:41
|
Bugs item #1643611, was opened at 2007-01-24 17:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nom_de_plume You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1643611&group_id=12740 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Invalid >Priority: 1 Private: No Submitted By: nom_de_plume (nom_de_plume) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 30/360US Day Count Convention Initial Comment: If Date1 = 30 Dec 2005 and Date2 = 31 Dec 2005 Then the day count fraction returns 0? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: nom_de_plume (nom_de_plume) Date: 2007-01-25 08:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1700464 Originator: YES On seconds thought, this is not a bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1643611&group_id=12740 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-25 06:47:40
|
Bugs item #1643611, was opened at 2007-01-24 17:03 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by nom_de_plume You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1643611&group_id=12740 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: nom_de_plume (nom_de_plume) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 30/360US Day Count Convention Initial Comment: If Date1 = 30 Dec 2005 and Date2 = 31 Dec 2005 Then the day count fraction returns 0? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1643611&group_id=12740 |
|
From: Ferdinando A. <na...@am...> - 2007-01-24 18:22:52
|
I personally don't mind since I've setup my filters to split the traffic originating from different modules. I'm not against having different mailing lists, but having just one mailing list instead of 6 is better for sub/unsub. We could ask this question on QuantLib-CVS thank you ciao -- Nando On 1/24/07, Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 01:00 +0100, eric ehlers wrote: > > previously ObjectHandler and related projects were migrated out of > > QuantLib into separate SourceForge projects, this led to some problems > > and it was agreed to migrate all the code back into the QL CVS > > repository. > > Hi all, > with regard to this, do people (this means you!) prefer that commit > logs for all modules go into the QuantLib-cvs mailing list, or should we > direct the XL-related ones to another list? Should we ask on the > QuantLib-cvs mailing list? > > Later, > Luigi > > > ---------------------------------------- > > I hate quotations. > -- Ralph Waldo Emerson > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > QuantLib-dev mailing list > Qua...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev > |
|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@gm...> - 2007-01-24 17:09:02
|
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 01:00 +0100, eric ehlers wrote: > previously ObjectHandler and related projects were migrated out of > QuantLib into separate SourceForge projects, this led to some problems > and it was agreed to migrate all the code back into the QL CVS > repository. Hi all, with regard to this, do people (this means you!) prefer that commit logs for all modules go into the QuantLib-cvs mailing list, or should we direct the XL-related ones to another list? Should we ask on the QuantLib-cvs mailing list? Later, Luigi ---------------------------------------- I hate quotations. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-24 15:03:22
|
Bugs item #1643611, was opened at 2007-01-24 17:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1643611&group_id=12740 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: nom_de_plume (nom_de_plume) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 30/360US Day Count Convention Initial Comment: If Date1 = 30 Dec 2005 and Date2 = 31 Dec 2005 Then the day count fraction returns 0? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=1643611&group_id=12740 |
|
From: Toyin A. <toy...@ho...> - 2007-01-23 17:38:58
|
Hi all, Just a quick note. I've copied up 2.5 hours of new free video training content based on my library which is derived from QuantLib. There are three new videos (wmv video format, approx 12MB each). The first covers yieldcurve stripping, the second querying yieldcurve objects and the third volatility curve object creation and querying (including the SABR curve for both equity type products and interest rate underlyers). Those who know the QuantLib object model already should feel at home with a lot of the objects created. More videos are currently in development. Hope you enjoy them... Best Regards, Toyin Akin, CapeTools QuantTools www.QuantTools.com _________________________________________________________________ Get Hotmail, News, Sport and Entertainment from MSN on your mobile. http://www.msn.txt4content.com/ |
|
From: Joseph W. <jo...@gn...> - 2007-01-23 00:51:27
|
I've synced up QuantLib-SWIG to the latest changes in QuantLib, but there is a
problem with InArrearIndexedCouponVector which I've commented out for now.
The problem is that InArrearIndexedCouponVector tries to use
return QuantLib::IndexedCouponVector<InArrearIndexedCoupon>(
schedule,paymentAdjustment,
nominals,fixingDays,libor,
gearings,spreads,dayCount,
isInArrears);
The trouble with that is the IndexedCouponVector expects the coupon to have an
isInArrears parameter which InArrearIndexedCoupon doesn't have.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Wang Ph.D. - jo...@gn...
China Derivatives Researcher and Software Developer - QuantLib
http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Roadrunner
|
|
From: Joseph W. <jo...@gn...> - 2007-01-22 05:02:02
|
Just to let you know where I am with this. I'm trying to get tvtk and mayavi2 installed before proceding further with trying to interface this all with quantlib. tvtk and mayavi2 are open source enhancements made to vtk by the Austin company enthought, which you can read about at http://www.enthought.com/ I figure that it will be about a month before I get completely acclimated with the tools. Right now a high priority for me is to figure out how to get these tools built with RPM. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joseph Wang Ph.D. - jo...@gn... China Derivatives Researcher and Software Developer - QuantLib http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Roadrunner |
|
From: eric e. <eri...@gm...> - 2007-01-16 00:00:15
|
hello, previously ObjectHandler and related projects were migrated out of QuantLib into separate SourceForge projects, this led to some problems and it was agreed to migrate all the code back into the QL CVS repository. and i have branched, so below is a complete list of projects and the branch names. regards, eric ObjectHandler R000200-branch gensrc R000200-branch QuantLibAddin R000400-branch QuantLibXL R000400-branch log4cxx - no branch and no change since the "0.9.7.b" build from the previous release |