|
From: Ferdinando A. <na...@am...> - 2007-01-24 18:22:52
|
I personally don't mind since I've setup my filters to split the traffic originating from different modules. I'm not against having different mailing lists, but having just one mailing list instead of 6 is better for sub/unsub. We could ask this question on QuantLib-CVS thank you ciao -- Nando On 1/24/07, Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 01:00 +0100, eric ehlers wrote: > > previously ObjectHandler and related projects were migrated out of > > QuantLib into separate SourceForge projects, this led to some problems > > and it was agreed to migrate all the code back into the QL CVS > > repository. > > Hi all, > with regard to this, do people (this means you!) prefer that commit > logs for all modules go into the QuantLib-cvs mailing list, or should we > direct the XL-related ones to another list? Should we ask on the > QuantLib-cvs mailing list? > > Later, > Luigi > > > ---------------------------------------- > > I hate quotations. > -- Ralph Waldo Emerson > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > QuantLib-dev mailing list > Qua...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev > |