|
From: newbie73 <lui...@av...> - 2007-09-19 20:37:46
|
Apologies if this seems to be off topic, though this is somewhat related to a pipe dream I had regarding QuantLib. If it is possible to allow some external scripting language to define a new payoff structure, why not go ahead and allow the interpreter to extend QuantLib in general? Perhaps an embedded version of Python could work or some other method of allowing "add-in" style hooks/call backs. :-) ------------------------------------------- Well, I wouldn't put in into the core library anyway; it would be great to have it available as an additional module. The point is that I wouldn't commit to that one as "the" payoff interpreter. People using, say, the Python or Ruby bindings might want to define such an interpreter in their native language---it could be done easily enough using SWIG. Luigi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list Qua...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PayoffInterpreter%3A-specify-new-pay-offs-and-price-them-without-code-recompilation-tf4470210.html#a12785707 Sent from the quantlib-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |