|
From: DU V. DE V. F. G. P. <fra...@ca...> - 2007-06-19 17:22:16
|
>No, this is not correct. If the nodes are far apart, there's nothing >that forbids the discount at a node to be less than half of the = previous >value; yet you're preventing such a curve from bootstrapping. I agree with you that even if this is unlikely to happen it is not = satisfactory to leave such a hole. Let say that it is a quick fix. >If the minimum at 0 was wrecking havoc on the spline, we could use the >other solve() method in Solver1D, namely, the one that takes a guess = and >a step and tries to bracket the solution on its own. It's going to be >slower, but probably more robust. Thanks for your suggestion, I was not aware of this method,=20 Fran=E7ois |