|
From: Ferdinando A. <na...@am...> - 2007-04-18 16:31:24
|
Hi Luigi and all I've created the folder structure that I feel will be ok for proper categorization of all evolvers we're going to develop and which will be much more than the current 7. The possible evolvers I would like to see in QuantLib are about 6 (pc, ipc, euler, capc, cani, and PPR terminal measure) for each of the 6 dynamics (log-normal cot swap rate, log-normal cm swap rate, log-normal fwd rate, normal cot swap rate, normal cm swap rate, normal fwd rate) As a matter of fact the folder reorganization was just the step before asking for volunteers to implement the next batch of 6 evolvers: ipc and euler for log-normal coterminal, log-normal constant maturity swap rates, and normal fwd rates. The task is not hard and given the current 7 evolvers is mostly copy/paste/adapt (and hopefully test). Any volunteer would get a lot of credit for not so much work ;-) and it would be a good chance to get familiar with the current code base. ciao -- Nando On 4/18/07, Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 16:02 +0200, Luigi Ballabio wrote: > > Aren't we going a bit too far? I mean, there's one evolver per subfolder > > right now---with some subfolders being empty, too. At this point, this > > much structure looks to me like a burden more than a help---especially > > since using Doxygen, we can easily generate a reference page where all > > the evolvers are listed and where it is stated whether each one is > > normal/lognormal and what rate type they evolve. > > Moreover, since there were just 7 evolvers in the folder and since you > had done a good job in naming them properly, it was hardly any difficult > to find what one was looking for... > > Luigi |