|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@gm...> - 2007-04-18 16:13:11
|
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 16:02 +0200, Luigi Ballabio wrote: > Aren't we going a bit too far? I mean, there's one evolver per subfolder > right now---with some subfolders being empty, too. At this point, this > much structure looks to me like a burden more than a help---especially > since using Doxygen, we can easily generate a reference page where all > the evolvers are listed and where it is stated whether each one is > normal/lognormal and what rate type they evolve. Moreover, since there were just 7 evolvers in the folder and since you had done a good job in naming them properly, it was hardly any difficult to find what one was looking for... Luigi ---------------------------------------- Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future. -- Niels Bohr |