Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Quantlib-dev] Roadmap to QuantLib 1.0
|
From: Alan K. <ki...@us...> - 2006-11-07 13:24:26
|
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Would it be possible to include benchmarking in 1.0? I'm thinking of data set + parameter settings that go beyond the simple functional tests.</font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br> Alan King<br> Math Sciences<br> IBM Thomas J Watson Research Center<br> 914-945-1236<br> http://www.research.ibm.com/people/k/kingaj/</font> <br> <br> <br> <table width=100%> <tr valign=top> <td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...></b> </font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: qua...@li...</font> <p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">11/07/2006 06:48 AM</font> <td width=59%> <table width=100%> <tr valign=top> <td> <div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div> <td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">QuantLib developers <qua...@li...></font> <tr valign=top> <td> <div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div> <td> <tr valign=top> <td> <div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div> <td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[Quantlib-dev] Roadmap to QuantLib 1.0</font></table> <br> <table> <tr valign=top> <td> <td></table> <br></table> <br> <br> <br><tt><font size=2><br> Hi all,<br> now that 0.3.14 is out, I'd like to float around a couple of ideas on<br> how to get to a 1.0 release during 2007. Feel free to throw in your<br> comments.<br> <br> First: next release will complete the implementation of the Libor market<br> model we're developing with Mark Joshi. I'd use this occasion to leave<br> the 0.3 series and go to 0.4.0. This one might act as a stable release<br> until 1.0 comes out (which means that depending on request and on the<br> number of bugs we find, we might think of getting out a bug-fix only<br> 0.4.1 based on the 0.4.0 branch.)<br> <br> Second: After a stable 0.4.0 is out, I'd grab the chance to make any<br> non-backward-compatible change we might need before 1.0 (I can think of<br> a few.) I'd also switch the repository to Subversion, which would make<br> it easier to move stuff around. The resulting release would be a<br> candidate for 1.0---I'm open to suggestions as to whether to call it<br> 0.9.0 or 1.0b1, i.e., as to which version number would possibly lure<br> more people into downloading it and trying it out.<br> <br> Shortly thereafter, I would put out the actual 1.0 release.<br> <br> Thoughts?<br> <br> Luigi<br> <br> <br> ---------------------------------------- <br> <br> Quote me as saying I was misquoted. <br> -- Groucho Marx <br> <br> <br> <br> -------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?<br> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier<br> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo<br> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642<br> _______________________________________________<br> QuantLib-dev mailing list<br> Qua...@li...<br> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev<br> </font></tt> <br> |
