|
From: Ferdinando A. <na...@am...> - 2006-09-12 07:47:32
|
Hi Toyin it hasn't been discussed yet, but I'm actually in favor of deprecating (and then removing) Frequency adopting instead a more pervasive usage of Period. Frequency has been in QuantLib before Period, but nowadays I cannot see any good reason for retaing it, as it is less flexible than Period. The only plus might be the "Once" Frequency which doesn't have a clear equivalent Period. There is already ongoing work in QuantLib to allow Period as alternative to Frequency. As for your specific proposal: once we introduce EveryFifthWeek and EverySixthWeek, why not introduce EverySeventhWeek, etc? This is one of the reason I prefer Period which doesn't have this problem... look forward to feedback ciao -- Nando On 9/12/06, Toyin Akin <toy...@ho...> wrote: > > Hi Luigi, > > Is it possible to add the following additional Frequency types to quantLib? > (Assuming that the implementation is not too shabby) > > I've updated the files based on the most recent version within CVS. > > Thanking you in advance... > > Toy out. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > QuantLib-dev mailing list > Qua...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev > > > > |