Re: [Quantlib-dev] python binding(and SWIG interface in general)

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

On 03/25/2006 05:41:29 AM, gary ng wrote:
> I tried to use the python binding instead of C++ but it seems that if
> I want to do anything that is not in quantlib, I still need to =20
> program them in C++ then expose my implementation in SWIG, instead of =20
> implementing the logic in python. Is this the intended usage of the =20
> binding ?

It is not the intended usage, but the bindings often lag a bit behind =20
the library. In your case, the bindings should be extended so that =20
HullWhite public members are exposed. I'll try and do it for next =20
release---or you can modify shortratemodels.i and send me a patch. Feel =20
free to ask for advice if you undertake the task.

Later,
	Luigi


----------------------------------------

Hofstadter's Law:
         It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take
         Hofstadter's Law into account.