Re: [Quantlib-dev] Interpolator semantics

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

Hi Joseph,
	at work already? Aren't you a few hours west of here?

On 11/16/2005 01:00:57 PM, Joseph Wang wrote:
> I see your point.  You can go ahead and remove it.  You might have to =20
> fix some places where that is used.

Ok, no problem for the fixes.

> Also, what is your opinion about using transform in sampled curve.

I'm agnostic. As it seems to me it's still a class in progress, we =20
might postpone the judgment until the interface stabilizes.


> One other thing, has anyone ever done an interactive code review =20
> online?

It could be a nice event to hold for the QuantLib anniversary (the =20
library is going to turn 5-years old this December.) But I have no idea =20
of the software we might need to do something of this kind. Are you =20
aware of any such facility?

Later,
	Luigi


----------------------------------------

Academic: a term of opprobrium applied to those that do their job well
by those who cannot.
-- Sir Ernest Gowers