Re: [Quantlib-dev] Interpolator semantics

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

On 11/15/2005 07:25:57 PM, Joseph Wang wrote:
>>=20
> It's because I want to set extrapolate to true.  At first I thought =20
> it would be easy to add it to C++ class, but that would break the =20
> bridge pattern.

Joseph,
	it's done. You can check out the modified code and look at the =20
relevant test case in test-suite/interpolations.cpp to see how to =20
enable extrapolation.

On an unrelated note, I'm not sure that the transform() method you =20
added really belongs to Array, since a) it just wraps a call to =20
std::transform, b) it is less flexible, being only self-applied while =20
std::transform allows writing to a different output array, and c) I'd =20
like to keep class interfaces as lean as possible. Would it be a major =20
inconvenience for you if I took it back?

Later,
	Luigi

----------------------------------------

The shortest way to do many things is to do only one thing at once.
-- Samuel Smiles