Re: [Quantlib-dev] Interpolator semantics

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

On Nov 15, 2005, at 7:25 PM, Joseph Wang wrote:
>>     the extrapolation parameter is optional, so the interpolations  
>> can be used as a unary function. In what way it doesn't work? Is it  
>> because you do want to pass the parameter?
>>
> It's because I want to set extrapolate to true.  At first I thought it 
> would be easy to add it to C++ class, but that would break the bridge 
> pattern.

I see. I think it can be done---I'll try and change it tomorrow.

Luigi