Re: [Quantlib-dev] QL FpML Object Handler Modifications

[eric e. <eri...@gm...>]

Salut Fabrice

> Concerning my participation, I am still interested in coding part of
> the new QuantLib-FpML module, as described by Eric in his last post.

Sounds good.  Once we hear back from David on his preferences maybe
there will be a clear picture of how best to divide the work.  There
is also the QuantLib-XML module to be written.

> I was also thinking of contacting one of the FpML development groups
> to ask them what will be the next steps in the development of this
> language.

Of course you're welcome to do that but is it necessary?  Earlier in
this forum it's been clarified that any instrument in QuantLib is
already represented in FpML.  Separately there are non-instrument
classes such as StochasticProcess which are not and never will be
represented in FpML, for those we write QuantLib-XML.

Bonne soir=E9e
Eric