Re: [Quantlib-dev] tentative tarballs

[Dirk E. <ed...@de...>]

On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:32:31PM +0200, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
> On 2004.06.16 15:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >Something changed in the Makefiles.
> >
> >Is that caused by a new libtool version?  I guess I am simply behind
> >in terms of what is currently en vogue ...
> 
> Old libtool, new flags. It might (emphasis on might) make it feasible  
> to keep different versions installed.

Right, that's how it looks by encoding the major/minor in the filename.

> >From the looks of it, I need to make sure that the two .so libs (to  
> >which ldd on the example binary points) stay in the library package,  
> >and I should then be fine.  Comments?
> 
> I think so. lib*-0.3.7 should correspond to the old lib*.0.0.0.

Yes, I'll try that later then.
> 
> Later,
> 	Luigi
> 
> P.S. You won't have to depend on boost-regex in the final version (the  
> dependency probably came from a forgotten #include that I just nuked)

Ack. I may as well keep it in.  Would be nice to have configure checks for
the different boost pieces, though.

Ciao, Dirk

-- 
FEATURE:  VW Beetle license plate in California