Re: [Quantlib-dev] tentative tarballs

[Dirk E. <ed...@de...>]

On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:49:51AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:14:02PM +0200, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
> > On 2004.06.16 04:32, Mark Treiber wrote:
> > >I spoke too soon.  I just looked back at the console history and the  
> > >original time QuantLib and the test-suite compiled it was with -O2.   
> > >When gcc crashed with QuantLib-python it was compiling with -O3.  I'm  
> > >re-compiling QuantLib now with -O1 (hopefully I won't have to go all  
> > >the way to -O0).
> > 
> > Mark,
> > 	you might want to go all the way up to gcc 3.3.4 instead.
> > I just recompiled the sources with -O3, and I didn't get the error.
> 
> Seconded, for what it's worth. It builds fine here on i386 with the default
> -02, once I figured out which of the Debian boost development packages I
> needed (libboost-dev, libboost-regex-dev, libboost-test-dev). I now have to
> fix something in the package structure that seems to stem from the split of
> the main libraries. So on track, but a little late...

Something changed in the Makefiles. Up until 0.3.6, I would have

edd@basebud:/var/local/cache/pbuilder/result> dpkg -c libquantlib0_0.3.6-1_i386.deb | grep usr/lib
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2004-04-15 17:44:31 ./usr/lib/
-rw-r--r-- root/root   3660992 2004-04-15 17:44:31 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.so.0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root         0 2004-04-15 17:44:23 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.so.0 -> libQuantLib.so.0.0.0

in the runtime package, and 

edd@basebud:/var/local/cache/pbuilder/result> dpkg -c libquantlib0-dev_0.3.6-1_i386.deb | grep usr/lib
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2004-04-15 17:44:33 ./usr/lib/
-rw-r--r-- root/root  15932122 2004-04-15 17:44:33 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root         0 2004-04-15 17:44:29 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.so -> libQuantLib.so.0.0.0

in the development package.  The meta-rules where tagges on that, i.e.
/usr/lib/*.so and /usr/lib/*.a get moved into the -dev package.

Now I get 

basebud:/home/quantlib-0.3.6.rc.20040611/debian/libquantlib0-dev/usr/lib# ls -l
total 21912
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root      4742328 Jun 16 12:50 libQuantLib-0.3.7.so
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root     17215158 Jun 16 12:50 libQuantLib.a
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           20 Jun 16 12:50 libQuantLib.so -> libQuantLib-0.3.7.so
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       177061 Jun 16 12:50 libQuantLibFunctions-0.3.7.so
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       250240 Jun 16 12:50 libQuantLibFunctions.a
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           29 Jun 16 12:50 libQuantLibFunctions.so -> libQuantLibFunctions-0.3.7.so
basebud:/home/quantlib-0.3.6.rc.20040611/debian/libquantlib0-dev/usr/lib#

Is that caused by a new libtool version?  I guess I am simply behind in
terms of what is currently en vogue ...  From the looks of it, I need to
make sure that the two .so libs (to which ldd on the example binary points)
stay in the library package, and I should then be fine.  Comments?

Dirk

-- 
FEATURE:  VW Beetle license plate in California