|
From: Dirk E. <ed...@de...> - 2004-04-06 14:51:00
|
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 04:31:43PM +0200, Ferdinando Ametrano wrote: > Hi Dirk > > >> if we could have the R extension code in a CVS repository I would try > >> to take care of its code requirements while developing/changing > >QuantLib. > > > >That's probably a good idea. Shall we add it as a branch in the main QL > >repository, or should we keep it apart? > > On one hand I would prefer to have it in the main QL repository, on the > other hand the R extension is GPL, so there could be some confusion > about/with the QuantLib (BSD) license. > > My opinion is that unless you release the R extension under the QuantLib > license it would be better to have a dedicated SourceForge project. It > could be a QuantLibR project or even a QuantLibGNU project to host any > present and future GPL extension for QuantLib. > > What is your preference Dirk? Ok, how about if we put it on alioth.debian.org then? Non-debianers get accounts there too, and the codebase is the common sourceforge code before it went non-free. Dirk -- The relationship between the computed price and reality is as yet unknown. -- From the pac(8) manual page |