|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@fa...> - 2003-11-25 14:06:51
|
On 2003.11.24 19:16, Ferdinando Ametrano wrote: > Getting back to an old question of yours about the templetization of > trees: I was wondering if that in your opinion would make more > difficult the merge of the Finite Difference framework and the > Lattice framework, which currently includes trees. > I would say that the merging of Finite Difference and Lattice should > be the top priority design on that front, and would stay away from > anything that might make this process harder. > What your take on this issue? They're two sides of the same coin. Either we give them both a templated implementation, or none. Adding finite differences into the mix shouldn't make it any more difficult than it already is :) Later, Luigi |