Re: [Quantlib-dev] New golden master

[Luigi B. <lui...@fa...>]

At 09:03 PM 1/14/03 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:11:42AM +0100, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
>Nitpick: The naming sucks. I called the last one 0.3.0.9 [ so that it sorts
>higher than 0.3.0 but lower than the expected 0.3.1 ] and had to make this
>0.3.0.9.1.  I think it is a bad idea to replace one tar.gz with another that
>is different, yet sports the same version.

Well, these are (and the previous were) golden masters---meaning that they 
_are_ version 0.3.1. If the current tarballs don't show any problems, they 
will be released as they are. It is unfortunate that the previous tarballs 
had to be corrected, but at the time the hope was that they _were_ version 
0.3.1.
However, you're right---we'll have to find a way for you to say to the 
Debian system "these are 0.3.1, but not quite". A quick look at dselect 
shows me that the version of gcc-3.2 installed on sarge is 3.2.1-0pre3. 
Maybe this could work for next version's gm? Something like 0.3.2-0pre1, 
0.3.2-0pre2 if something needs to be changed, and 0.3.2-1 when it's final?

Bye,
         Luigi