Re: [Quantlib-dev] [Debian Bug#133913: quantlib-ruby: FTBFS: g++ 3.0 errors (hppa/unstable)]

[LaMont J. <la...@hp...>]

> LaMont:  In a situation like this, is it ok if I actually prevent building
> on hppa and ia64 via an explicit Architecture: tag in debian/control?

Better to leave it without the Architecture tag hack, since it _should_
build.  That way, when it does, you don't have to do anything special.
As it sits, uploading a new verison with the arch change will cause the
buildd to try it again, and, well....

The best thing might be to clone the defect over to ruby, and get the
headers fixed in ruby.  Just reassigning the bug is likely to get you
another bug report after I forget the details of _this_ package, and
that'll only get you annoyed... :-)

lamont