|
From: Philippe H. <phi...@ex...> - 2020-09-24 16:56:07
|
I am looking to develop a quantitative infrastructure for corporate bonds. As I see it, there are two ways to proceed as below. I am asking this group whether my summary of these two options is accurate or whether there are better approaches? Approach 1: Simple Interpolated Spread Curve Under this approach, bond cash flows would be discounted at UST + spread, from a curve built by shifting a QL UST curve by a bond specific corporate z-spread. In turn, such corporate z-spread would be interpolated from a z-spread curve, itself calibrated by a set of benchmark corporate bonds. Approach 2: CDS / Hazard Rate Curve This approach would first use existing QL CDS helpers and hazard rate curves to calibrate such curve to observable CDS quotes. In turn, a corporate bond could be repriced by adding a "basis" spread on top of the CDS curve. However, while QL appears to have a full set of methods and classes for CDS and hazard rate curves, it doesn't seem to have any analytics or methods to price corporate bonds on top of a CDS curve as described above Respective Methods Pros and Cons: All else equal, I would favor Approach 2 because it allows both bonds and credit derivatives to be priced and risk managed, as CDS curves are conveniently available on standardized IMM dates. However, that requires the layer of corporate bond analytics and classes on top of a hazard curve that I do not believe exists in QL. I am probably missing something, so most curious about what QL users think about this particular problem? Philippe Hatstadt -- Brokerage services offered through Exos Securities LLC, member of SIPC <http://www.sipc.org/> / FINRA <http://www.finra.org/>. For important disclosures, click here <https://www.exosfinancial.com/disclosures>. |