Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Quantlib-dev] Addin Question
|
From: Eric E. <eri...@re...> - 2018-09-28 11:13:41
|
Hi Richard, I never noticed that GIT SETUP.md file. Either it was added by someone other than me along the way, or it was generated automatically by github. I'm not sure it's correct. The v1.13.x branch of QuantLibAddin-Old should be compatible with the v1.13.x branch of QuantLib, or with the 1.13 release of QuantLib. Many thanks for taking a look at this. Kind Regards, Eric On 09/27/2018 09:02 AM, dr....@gm... wrote: > Hi Eric, > Quick note... > > I've learnt a bit of git. Not very much, to be honest, but enough to fork your QLA-old link (eehlers/QuantLibAddin-Old). > > I followed the instructions in eehlers/QuantLibAddin-Old/GIT SETUP.md and forked lballabio/QuantLib too. > > My objective is that, with some luck, be able to push back some of the changes and code that I have been working on. However, the 2 projects seem to conflict at this point... Your copy of the GIT SETUP isn't necessarily correct for this... > > 1) Point 3 isn't the path I expected - so I stuck with eehlers/QuantLibAddin-Old > > 2) lballabio/QuantLib results in some errors... > 4>c:\ql_gitbuild\quantlibaddin-old\quantlib\ql\models\calibrationhelper.hpp(116): error C2371: 'QuantLib::CalibrationHelper': redefinition; different basic types > 4>c:\ql_gitbuild\quantlibaddin-old\quantlibaddin\qlo\calibrationhelpers.hpp(29): note: see declaration of 'QuantLib::CalibrationHelper' > > So I pulled down version 1.12 and used that instead. > > It builds now so I should be able to some stuff pushed out, although it's probably going to be a bit piecemeal as I'm getting busy again. > > Kind regards > Richard > > Dr....@Gm... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Ehlers <eri...@re...> > Sent: 20 June 2018 11:36 > To: Richard Marshall <dr....@gm...>; John Samler <js...@ma...> > Cc: qua...@li...; ig...@gm... > Subject: Re: [Quantlib-dev] Addin Question > > > I don’t actually know how to feed back improvements into the project? > Is there someone that could tell us the best way? > > Please make a pull request to this repo: > > https://github.com/eehlers/QuantLibAddin-Old > > Kind Regards, > Eric > > On 2018-06-20 11:26, Richard Marshall wrote: >> Hi John, Eric & Francois, >> >> That would be great. It would certainly push the project forwards a >> step or 2 for very little effort. >> >> I don’t actually know how to feed back improvements into the project? >> Is there someone that could tell us the best way? >> >> Also, (maybe of more interest to Francois) I had a look at the >> instructions on how to build Quantlib and saw that I had to download >> stuff, install stuff, etc etc. I have decided that I like my computer >> the way it is! So, I’ve set up a google cloud account (MS and AWS have >> similar offerings with free credits) where I can run a virtual machine >> with windows os that will build the project. >> >> I have realised that this way of working has a secondary advantage of >> being able to do my work, on my machine (in its original state) after >> kicking off the necessary build processes which will would probably >> max out my laptop’s capabilities and render it unusable for a while. >> >> I’ve only just started this on Monday. So I haven’t got very far yet. >> I’m following a couple of YouTube videos (search YouTube for >> “introduction to quantlib”) and just going to see where the adventure >> leads me... >> >> Kind regards >> Richard >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 19 Jun 2018, at 17:10, John Samler <js...@ma... >> <mailto:js...@ma...>> wrote: >> >>> I've been exposing manually a couple of functions in QuantLibAddin in >>> my local version for a bit. It's admittedly a bit painful to have to >>> copy the code every time instead of just use the pre-compiled versions. >>> >>> I haven't tried to add to GitHub because I was expecting the Reposit >>> project to launch, which seems absolutely amazing! But I assume that >>> has been put on hold. >>> >>> I guess will make sense to just try to add to GitHub the changes I >>> make which will benefit other users. >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 6:02 PM >>> *From:* "Eric Ehlers" <eri...@re... >>> <mailto:eri...@re...>> >>> *To:* "Richard Marshall" <dr....@gm... >>> <mailto:dr....@gm...>>, >>> qua...@li... >>> <mailto:qua...@li...> >>> *Subject:* Re: [Quantlib-dev] Addin Question Hi Richard, >>> >>> Unfortunately these days I don't have time for more than just keeping >>> the project alive. Perhaps another kind soul here on the list would >>> volunteer to help out. >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> Eric >>> >>> On 2018-06-08 15:24, Richard Marshall wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> Is there any chance that the inflation swap-curve construction >>> could be exposed in the next release of the XL addin? >>>> I would find it really helpful! >>>> >>>> kind regards >>>> Richard >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> --------- >>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://Slashdot.org>! >>> http://sdm.link/slashdot >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> QuantLib-dev mailing list >>>> Qua...@li... >>> <mailto:Qua...@li...> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> --------- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's >>> most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://Slashdot.org>! >>> http://sdm.link/slashdot >>> _______________________________________________ >>> QuantLib-dev mailing list >>> Qua...@li... >>> <mailto:Qua...@li...> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev > |
