Re: [Quantlib-dev] pointer to instrument in engine constructor

[Dominik C. <dom...@ho...>]

Hi,
Thank you for your response.
Thanks,
Dominik


On 3 May 2018 1:32:12 pm Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> wrote:

Hello Dominik,
    it probably should.  We're stuck with the current implementation for backwards compatibility.

Luigi


On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:23 PM Dominik Cirmirakis <dom...@ho...<mailto:dom...@ho...>> wrote:
Hi,

Why an engine can't have a pointer to instrument to get all the details?
Copying details from instrument via arguments creates additional layer
of complexity and more code.

Thanks,

Dominik

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
Qua...@li...<mailto:Qua...@li...>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev