|
From: Klaus S. <kl...@sp...> - 2017-07-05 20:07:14
|
Hi, Awesome work. The major achievement for me is the lift to C++17 - even subtle details like the thread-safe observer pattern have been ported ! I wouldn't mind if boost is stilled present for some minor use cases. It will be difficult to replace all of it on all supported platforms. I would also appreciate if we move completely to a modern C++ version after 10++ years of C++03. best regards Klaus On Mittwoch, 5. Juli 2017 12:02:20 CEST Johannes Göttker-Schnetmann wrote: > Hi Hao, Peter, > > I also find this very interesting. Since C++ is moving at a better pace for > some time we need at some point decide how QuantLib reacts to this. > Personally I am using modern compilers and like the features modern C++ > provides. Therefore I would appreciate if QuantLib decides to fork or move > completely to a modern C++ version. > > Boost is in part an incubator of ideas, which at some point might make it > into the C++ standard. For QuantLib the most prominent instances are > boost::shared_pointer and boost:unique_pointer which are both in the > standard for quite some time now. I would prefer to use the standard > libraries instead of boost in those cases. > > Kind regards, > Johannes > > On 4. Jul 2017, at 17:38, Peter Caspers <pca...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi Hao, that’s very interesting. Do you know where the performance gain is > coming from, is it mostly MKL vs. UBLAS? Or are there other drivers as > well? > I’d also be interested in the motivation to do this in the first place, I > never thought boost as such was a bad thing? > The upgrade to C++17 is surely nice and makes sense, no doubt. > Best Regards > Peter > > On 04 Jul 2017, at 09:42, Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> wrote: > > Hello Hao, > that's great news---I've been wondering myself if this was possible. > I'll be sure to check out your project. > I suggest you also post to quantlib-users for greater exposure. > > Later, > Luigi > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 5:24 AM Hao Zhang via QuantLib-dev < > > qua...@li...> wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > I have removed all Boost dependency from QuantLib, and ported QuantLib to > > C++17. The code is hosted on GitHub (https://github.com/haozhangphd/ > > QuantLib-noBoost <https://github.com/haozhangphd/QuantLib-noBoost>). > > > > The ported code passes all test cases, and there are significant > > performance improvements in SOME functionalities. Using the QuantLib > > Benchmark Suite, Quantlib-noBoost gives 3425 mflops (running time 13.15s), > > while unmodified QuantLib gives 1440 mflops (running time 44.8s) on my > > Dell > > Inspiron 13 i7348 laptop, both running under identical conditions with > > identical compiler flags. The total running time of the whole test suite > > is > > also shorter by ~10% after Boost is removed. > > > > I will continue maintaining this project, and regularly backporting latest > > commits from QuantLib. I will also make this project work on other > > compilers besides GCC in the near future. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Hao > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! > > http://sdm.link/slashdot > > _______________________________________________ > > QuantLib-dev mailing list > > Qua...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! > http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ > QuantLib-dev mailing list > Qua...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot______ > _________________________________________ > QuantLib-dev mailing list > Qua...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |