Re: [Quantlib-dev] [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

For instance, Boost 1.54 seems to work (apart from linking, but that might
be an issue with the installation of gcc 3.4.6 I'm using).

Luigi


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:07 PM Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...>
wrote:

> Please try to see if the gcc-3.4 branch on GitHub works for you.  If so,
> clone it in your repo so that you can maintain it in the future: I probably
> won't include the changes in version 1.10.  My suggestion of testing
> earlier versions of Boost stands: most if not all the errors came from
> Boost code.
>
> Luigi
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:03 AM shailesh kumar <sha...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Luigi/Dirk,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick response.
>>
>> I am forced to perform role of archaeologist :)
>>
>> My Modified Duration component was earlier based on Quantlib 0.9.7 (last
>> built in 2007) but in order to support "negative jumps in interest-rate
>> curves"  and to incorporate other bug fixes, i upgraded the Quantlib
>> version to latest keeping the compiler version same as component also had
>> few external libraries dependencies built with gcc34/g++34
>>
>> Luigi,
>>
>> As suggested, I ran ./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS' but it
>> failed at squarerootprocessrndcalculator.cpp:64:   instantiated from here
>> Request to please guide so as to disable it at my end to proceed further.
>>
>> Regards
>> Shailesh Kumar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, right, it was you for Solaris as well.  It's good to have an
>>> archaeologist around :)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:28 Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I second Dirk that we probably shouldn't put much effort in making that
>>>> code compile. However, we can disable it so that the build succeeds, even
>>>> if the resulting library will miss a few features. In fact, I did the same
>>>> thing recently for an older Solaris compiler. May you try running configure
>>>> as
>>>>
>>>> ./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS'
>>>>
>>>> and see if you get to the end of the build?
>>>>
>>>> Luigi
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:16 Dirk Eddelbuettel <ed...@de...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
>>>>> | Hi Luigi,
>>>>> |
>>>>> | I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10
>>>>> as available at <
>>>>> | https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7
>>>>> (Oracle Linux
>>>>> | Server release 6.7)
>>>>> | using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat
>>>>> 3.4.6-19.el6)/
>>>>> | g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost
>>>>> version
>>>>> | 1.62.0
>>>>> |
>>>>> | I am getting below compilation error.
>>>>> |
>>>>> | ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated
>>>>> from here
>>>>> |
>>>>> /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/
>>>>> | roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
>>>>> | boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
>>>>> | boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
>>>>> | boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
>>>>> | boost::fusion::void_>&)'
>>>>> | make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
>>>>> | make[3]: Leaving directory
>>>>> `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
>>>>> | credit'
>>>>> | make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>>>> | make[2]: Leaving directory
>>>>> `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
>>>>> | make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>>>> | make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
>>>>> | make: *** [all] Error 2
>>>>> |
>>>>> | Request to please help me resolving this issue.
>>>>> | This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for
>>>>> gcc34/g++34
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dirk
>>>>>
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> | Regards
>>>>> | Shailesh Kumar
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> | On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <
>>>>> lui...@gm...>
>>>>> | wrote:
>>>>> |
>>>>> |     Hi all,
>>>>> |         preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at
>>>>> <https://
>>>>> |     sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but
>>>>> most
>>>>> |     changes are listed at
>>>>> https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?
>>>>> |     closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a
>>>>> few cycles
>>>>> |     available.
>>>>> |
>>>>> |     Thanks,
>>>>> |         Luigi
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> |     ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> |     ------------------
>>>>> |     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> |     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>> |     _______________________________________________
>>>>> |     QuantLib-users mailing list
>>>>> |     Qua...@li...
>>>>> |     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> | Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> | engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>> | _______________________________________________
>>>>> | QuantLib-users mailing list
>>>>> | Qua...@li...
>>>>> | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | ed...@de...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>