|
From: Francois B. <ig...@gm...> - 2015-11-15 09:03:45
|
Ah, I did a quick check and thought the name was available. I see now it was registered in May 2014 - not too long ago! ( https://api.github.com/orgs/quantlib ) Pity there's no contact info anywhere. Francois Botha On 13 November 2015 at 13:09, Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Francois, > we talked about that, and I'm not against it. We even tried making the > project account on GitHub, just to find that http://github.com/quantlib was > already taken, so in case we'll have to go for quantlib-official > or something like it. > > (Oh, and if you're the owner of the above project and you're reading this, > we would appreciate a lot if you could rename it and free it. Not > demanding, just asking. It would be a nice gesture.) > > For the time being, though, the idea was more that of a federation of > repos, so mine would be the main one for the core C++ library, Eric's would > be the main one for the Excel addin and so on. We kind of wanted to > de-bureaucratize the thing, as it were, so that if someone wrote another > QuantLib module there would be no need to ask to be included in the > "official" club. I appreciate that it could be confusing, though, so we're > open to feedback on this. > > Later, > Luigi > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 10:16 AM Francois Botha <ig...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Isn't this also a good time to create a quantlib organisation account on >> github and move the official repository to e.g. >> http://github.com/quantlib/quantlib ? Just a suggestion. I definitely >> don't want to detract from all the effort that Luigi has put in. It just >> seems the norm for projects to have their own organisation account on >> github these days. >> >> regards >> >> Francois Botha >> >> On 26 October 2015 at 16:09, Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> >> wrote: >> >>> [ cross-posted to quantlib-users and quantlib-dev; apologies for any >>> duplicates. ] >>> >>> Hi all, >>> I'm currently 3 or 4 issues away from setting up the 1.7 release. >>> >>> Shortly after doing that, and in concert with the other maintainers, >>> I'll reorganize the Git repository so that the current, monolithic one >>> containing all the modules will be split into smaller ones, with one module >>> per current directory; thus, there will be a repository for the core C++ >>> library, one for the Excel addin and so on. >>> >>> This will make it more convenient for the maintainers to manage the >>> modules for which they have responsibility, and will also make it a lot >>> easier to add new modules. We had considered doing this when we migrated >>> from subversion to git, and in hindsight we should have gone ahead at that >>> time. >>> >>> I'm aware this will cause inconveniences to the 500+ people that forked >>> the repository on GitHub. I am sorry for this, and I will try to minimize >>> the pain: I'll migrate the open pull requests to the new repository, and >>> I'll try to make some kind of guide to help those of you with local changes >>> to move them to the new fork. In the meantime, your current forks are not >>> going away. >>> >>> Thanks for the understanding. I'll post a timeline as soon as I have one. >>> >>> Luigi >>> >>> -- >>> >>> <http://leanpub.com/implementingquantlib> >>> <http://implementingquantlib.com> >>> <http://twitter.com/lballabio> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> QuantLib-dev mailing list >>> Qua...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev >>> >>> >> -- > > <http://leanpub.com/implementingquantlib> > <http://implementingquantlib.com> > <http://twitter.com/lballabio> > |