Re: [Quantlib-dev] Interpolated ZeroInflationIndexes

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

Hi Francois,
    did you ever submit this fix? I don't seem to remember it.
Or was the problem fixed in another way?

Luigi

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Francois Botha <ig...@gm...> wrote:

> Peter,
>
> Here is my first attempt at solving this bug. Can you confirm whether it
> solves your problem?
> https://github.com/igitur/quantlib/tree/inflation_reference_period_fix
>
> Francois Botha
>
>
> On 18 June 2014 17:27, Francois Botha <ig...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> Haha. I actually did read your email the other day, but I didn't make the
>> connection when I discovered the issue now. No fix yet, but I'll see if I
>> can get something together. It will have to  involve passing the original
>> reference date through to the fixing algorithm.
>>
>> F
>>
>> Francois Botha
>>
>>
>> On 18 June 2014 17:17, Peter Caspers <pca...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Francois,
>>>
>>> yes, you have to use June's 30 days. This is corresponding to the
>>> question I sent earlier (see below), the second (Murex) way of doing
>>> the interpolation is the correct one.
>>>
>>> Do you have a fix for that ? This would be great.
>>>
>>> best
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> I am comparing Murex and QuantLib concerning Inflation Pricing. I
>>> observe a difference in the way an index fixing is interpolated
>>> between known (i.e. already fixed) values. Here is an example:
>>> Take the EUHICP XT index which has fixings
>>> 01.08.2012 (Aug 12) 115.10
>>> 01.09.2012 (Sep 12) 115.97
>>> Now I want to look up the fixing on 28.08.2012 belonging to an
>>> observation date on 28.11.2012 (3m observation lag). In QL the
>>> interpolation is done as follows:
>>> Days between 01.08. and 01.09. = 31, Days between 01.08. and 28.08. =
>>> 27, Interpolated Fixing = 115.10 + 27/31 * ( 115.97 - 115.10 )
>>> In Murex on the opposite:
>>> Days between 01.11. and 01.12. = 30, Days between 01.11. and 28.11. =
>>> 27, Interpolated Fixing = 115.10 + 27/30 * ( 115.97 - 115.10 )
>>>
>>> On 18 June 2014 16:50, Francois Botha <ig...@gm...> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I think the interpolation in ZeroInflationIndex::fixing isn't exactly
>>> > correctly.
>>> >
>>> > Consider a linearly interpolated Zero Inflation Index with observation
>>> lag
>>> > of 4 months. If the reference date is in June, the observation date
>>> will be
>>> > in February, which has only 28 days. I believe the interpolation
>>> should use
>>> > June's 30 days instead of February's 28 days. As it is, the
>>> interpolation
>>> > will be "maxed out" by 28 June and will remain flat until 30 June.  Do
>>> you
>>> > guys agree?
>>> >
>>> > regards
>>> > Francois Botha
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk
>>> Solutions
>>> > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
>>> > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data.
>>> > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration
>>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > QuantLib-dev mailing list
>>> > Qua...@li...
>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
> _______________________________________________
> QuantLib-dev mailing list
> Qua...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
>
>


-- 
<https://implementingquantlib.blogspot.com>
<https://twitter.com/lballabio>