Re: [Quantlib-dev] Retiring quantlib-dev

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

Hi Dirk,
    thanks for your opinion (which is not discounted as much as you
say, since I guess you're the one with most experience in
participating to open-source projects...)
In fact I might have to jump a few hoops in order to disable the list
(which is also mirrored at Nabble and Gmane) so it might be more work
that it's worth. Hmm.

Later,
    Luigi


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <ed...@de...> wrote:
>
> On 18 March 2014 at 14:38, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
> | Hi all,
> |     as the amount of traffic is not so high that we need to divide it
> | between two lists, and as the difference between them wasn't always so
> | clear to begin with, the other admins and I were thinking of retiring
> | the quantlib-dev list and only rely on quantlib-users. The dev list
> | will remain online as a searchable archive, but we'll close it for
> | posting. Those of you that still aren't subscribed to quantlib-users
> | (close to none, I guess) can subscribe at
> | <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users>. We're
> | still open to hear any objection, of course.
>
> Count me in as voting against. [1]
>
> The infrastructure is set up, it costs as nothing and having the optionality
> of discussing _implementation details_ is worth something.
>
> Dirk
>
> [1] Steep discuountactor applicable as I am not that visible.
>
> --
> Dirk Eddelbuettel | ed...@de... | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com



-- 
<https://implementingquantlib.blogspot.com>
<https://twitter.com/lballabio>