|
From: Ferdinando M. A. <fer...@am...> - 2014-02-18 08:55:22
|
Peter, I am currently not using that code in my day-by-day and have little time to investigate: I'll just trust your judgement. by the way, thank you for all your contributions in the recent months, you've really stepped your game up ciao -- Nando On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Peter Caspers <pca...@gm...>wrote: > I don't know, but if the issue is still there, shouldn't we better fix > it in the NumericHaganPricer by introducing a hard upper integration > bound at 2 ? > Peter > > > On 18 February 2014 07:51, Ferdinando M. Ametrano > <fer...@am...> wrote: > > Mmm... I seem to remember something about the only existing model at the > > time having issues on integrating the smile up to infinitum. > > Is this not the case anymore? > > > > On Feb 17, 2014 8:36 PM, "Peter Caspers" <pca...@gm...> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> is there a reason that the standard cms swaps constructed with MakeCms > >> have a capped rate > >> at 200% ? > >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/lballabio/quantlib/blob/master/QuantLib/ql/instruments/makecms.cpp#L43 > >> > >> If no one objects I would like to send a pull request to remove the > >> cap. This might impact results > >> in existing code though, so I thought I better ask here. > >> > >> Thank you > >> Peter > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications > >> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. > >> Read the Whitepaper. > >> > >> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > >> _______________________________________________ > >> QuantLib-dev mailing list > >> Qua...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev > |