|
From: Peter C. <pca...@gm...> - 2014-02-18 08:48:24
|
I don't know, but if the issue is still there, shouldn't we better fix it in the NumericHaganPricer by introducing a hard upper integration bound at 2 ? Peter On 18 February 2014 07:51, Ferdinando M. Ametrano <fer...@am...> wrote: > Mmm... I seem to remember something about the only existing model at the > time having issues on integrating the smile up to infinitum. > Is this not the case anymore? > > On Feb 17, 2014 8:36 PM, "Peter Caspers" <pca...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is there a reason that the standard cms swaps constructed with MakeCms >> have a capped rate >> at 200% ? >> >> >> https://github.com/lballabio/quantlib/blob/master/QuantLib/ql/instruments/makecms.cpp#L43 >> >> If no one objects I would like to send a pull request to remove the >> cap. This might impact results >> in existing code though, so I thought I better ask here. >> >> Thank you >> Peter >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications >> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. >> Read the Whitepaper. >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> QuantLib-dev mailing list >> Qua...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |