Re: [Quantlib-dev] Bug report, BlackScholesCalculator

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

It might not be the order you expect, but why should this be a mistake?
The parameters are used correctly. (You can check by putting some
numbers in.)

Luigi


On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 21:05 -0400, Yue Zhao wrote:

> For the constructor of BlackScholesCalculator, the declaration is:
> 
> 
> BlackScholesCalculator(Option::type optionType, Real strike, Real
> spot, ...)
> 
> 
> should it really be:
> 
> 
> BlackScholesCalculator(Option::type optionType, Real spot, Real
> strike, ...) ???
> 
> 
> I know this is a minor mistake, but since there's no complete
> documentation, you might want to fix this
> 
> 
> Best
> 
> 
> Cat Z
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
> Learn about the latest advances in developing for the 
> BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more.
> See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 
> _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list Qua...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev

-- 

Brady's First Law of Problem Solving: 
When confronted by a difficult problem, you can solve it more 
easily by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone 
Ranger have handled this?"