Re: [Quantlib-dev] [QuantLib-svn] SF.net SVN: quantlib:[17886] trunk/QuantLib

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 14:57 +0000, na...@us... wrote:
> Revision: 17886
>           http://quantlib.svn.sourceforge.net/quantlib/?rev=17886&view=rev
> Author:   nando
> Date:     2011-07-14 14:57:02 +0000 (Thu, 14 Jul 2011)
> 
> Log Message:
> -----------
> added truncated Schedule constructor (and removed unused private data member)

Just wondering if a method would be more explicit---e.g., something like

  Schedule s = originalSchedule.until(d);

might be more readable than

  Schedule s(originalSchedule, d);

Thoughs?

	Luigi


-- 

Poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese. 
-- Gilbert K. Chesterton