Re: [Quantlib-dev] destructor performance, observables with large observer lists

[Roland L. <rol...@go...>]

Hi Plamen,

you are right, using std::set instead of std::list does it as well,  same speed of termination as the previous proposal, and the test suite shows no errors. 
I'd definitely prefer this enhancement, see attached.

Does anybody see a reason/need to keep track of the order of observer registration that we got with the original observable.hpp?

Regards,
Roland