|
From: <tar...@li...> - 2011-01-27 06:59:56
|
Hi Peter, well I dont know exactly what's happened with boost ...I already use them with QuantLib and they work quite well. Now that I am trying to use the QuantLibAddin, the boosts are giving me a lot of issues. Actually I followed your suggestion and I used the bjam. i followed exactly what is written in http://quantlib.org/install/vc9.shtml (Appendix: Manual boost installation)) and it looks like they are well installed in fact I replicated the example into the appendix and it worked well. Then I tried to start with the first totorial in http://quantlib. org/quantlibaddin/tutorials.html (Build QuantlibXL from source code) and I build one by one the project into the solution QuantLibXL_full_vc8 and when I arrived to build QuantLibXLStatic I got this error fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libboost_serialization_vc80_mt_s_1_43. lib' In fact I can not find this lib file into boost folder. Actually, if I check into C:\Program Files\boost\boost_1_43_0 there is not a folder lib which I am expecting to be; am I wrong? Same error I got if I build the solution. The configuration I used is Release (static runtine) by the way, I did not modified nothing into the configuration properties. Any suggestion is well appreciated. Regards, Paolo >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: lui...@gm... >Data: 25/01/2011 10.39 >A: "Bojan Nikolic"<bo...@bn...> >Cc: "tar...@li..."<tar...@li...>, <quantlib-dev@lists. sourceforge.net> >Ogg: Re: [Quantlib-dev] Problem building QuantlibAddIn > >On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 07:18 +0000, Bojan Nikolic wrote: >> "tar...@li..." <tar...@li...> writes: >> >> > fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libboost_serializetion-vc80-mt- 1_43. >> > lib' >> >> That is a spelling mistake -- should be 'libboost_serialization-vc80-mt- 1_43.lib' > >I don't find it by running grep on the projects, though. Paolo, did you >modify the project files? If not, what particular project is failing in >the solution, and what QuantLib version are you using? > >Luigi > > >-- > >Hanlon's Razor: >Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained >by stupidity. > > > |