|
From: Ferdinando A. <na...@am...> - 2009-11-07 19:53:42
|
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> wrote: > A change that made the library > compile would be another matter, but given the choice, I'd rather take > Plamen's solution than having the compiler change its behavior. If you > confirm that the library compiles by adding BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG to the > preprocessor definitions, I'd be happy to take that change. I cannot confirm it until Monday, but I trust Plamen :-) so you might just make up your mind if you want the define in some header file (my preference) or the project settings. Just for the record, it seems to me we changed compiler native behavior when we switched "disable language extensions" to Yes; anyway I would stick to that choice. Finally on Monday I might report if everything compiles switching "disable language extensions" back to No, and commit a few more code tweaks to avoid warnings in the compiler native behavior ;-) BTW what about the patches needed by VC7 ? Don't we include them in 0.9.9 ? ciao -- Nando PS C'mon Luigi... a third release candidate is looming... |