Re: [Quantlib-dev] default 0*Days value for Period in QLXL

[Ferdinando A. <na...@am...>]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio
<lui...@gm...> wrote:
> Would it be feasible to use a little adapter class in QLA?
It would, but it's probably unneeded. It's arcane to me, but I'm
pretty sure autogenerated code can be smarter than it is now.

btw what's against Period(std::string) ?

> P.S. On a related note, how about the hideous 0*Years vs 0*Days thing?
> I'm still shaking from that one :)

I'll get back on this as soon as I'll get more empirical evidences

ciao -- Nando