Re: [Quantlib-dev] Heston and ExactVariance

[Dima <dim...@go...>]

This will imply that users which run their old code with QL 0.9.9
will see an exception while the old version didn't throw one. Maybe,
Klaus can say something here


2009/10/5 Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...>

> On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 17:46 +0200, Dima wrote:
> > Well, obviously we shouldn't change the name until we have the
> > alternative implementation for the "correct" type. Otherwise it will
> > not be backwards compatible. Users will call the new version in
> > their old code and will be sent to nirvana :)
>
> I'm not sure that I want to surprise users, even in a good way.
> I'd rather rename the existing implementation, leave the ExactVariance
> missing, and add it in a later release.
>
> Luigi
>
>
> --
>
> Ogden's Law:
> The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
>
>
>