Re: [Quantlib-dev] Heston and ExactVariance

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 17:46 +0200, Dima wrote:
> Well, obviously we shouldn't change the name until we have the
> alternative implementation for the "correct" type. Otherwise it will
> not be backwards compatible. Users will call the new version in 
> their old code and will be sent to nirvana :)

I'm not sure that I want to surprise users, even in a good way.
I'd rather rename the existing implementation, leave the ExactVariance
missing, and add it in a later release.

Luigi


-- 

Ogden's Law: 
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.