|
From: <s.i...@gm...> - 2009-09-29 15:41:21
|
I guess I'd use pImpl for the compilation benefits and also as - most of the time - we'd like users to reuse an existing object, not re-creating what is (for many cases) a functor. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -----Original Message----- From: Luigi Ballabio <lui...@gm...> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:57:18 To: <s.i...@gm...> Cc: <qua...@li...> Subject: Re: [Quantlib-dev] Dates On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 15:15 +0200, Luigi Ballabio wrote: > Hmm. Probably pimpl, what do you think? A quick note, since my coworker just read and misinterpreted the above, thus sending shivers down my spine: I was not being sarcastic. Let me rephrase: I'd probably go for pimpl, but I'm not 100% sure. Do you have any opinion on the matter? Luigi -- Dealing with failure is easy: work hard to improve. Success is also easy to handle: you've solved the wrong problem. Work hard to improve. -- Alan Perlis |