Re: [Quantlib-dev] Some more explanation about LongstaffSchwartz

[Klaus S. <kl...@sp...>]

Hi 

On Saturday 26 September 2009 14:57:41 Andrea wrote:
>
> which implies exactly the opposite of what the comment says (exercise[j] is
> > 0.0)


opps, the comment is misleading (or simply wrong;-). I'm going to remove the 
comment. Thanks!

regards
 Klaus