Re: [Quantlib-dev] The Null<> Class

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 07:58 +0200, Jose Aparicio-Navarro wrote:
> > > I'm aware of boost::optional and think it could be the way to go.
> > > However, I don't see an easy way to incorporate it in the current Null
> > > design.
> >
> > Neither do I. It would replace Null entirely.
> >
> 
> Should we start dropping Null<> and move to optional then?

Moving to optional for new functionality---yes.
Dropping Null in existing code---no. At this point we keep
compatibility.

Luigi


-- 

Green's Law of Debate: 
Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about.