Re: [Quantlib-dev] The Null<> Class

[Jose Aparicio-N. <ja...@fr...>]

> > I'm aware of boost::optional and think it could be the way to go.
> > However, I don't see an easy way to incorporate it in the current Null
> > design.
>
> Neither do I. It would replace Null entirely.
>

Should we start dropping Null<> and move to optional then?

Regards
Pepe