Re: [Quantlib-dev] credit modeling, Issuer, etc.

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 16:20 +0100, Roland Lichters wrote:

> What I'd really like to ask here- which credit parts do we want to see
> in the core library in version 1.0? I think version 1.0 deserves more
> than the cds :-). I had hoped that we can get the cds option,
> synthetic cdo, nth to default basket instruments out of experimental
> status by then, to encourage more people to take a look and contribute
> extensions. Do you think this is over-ambitious?

After having hoped to release version 1.0 last year, yes---I think it's
over-ambitious :)  I'd go for 1.0 with what we have now. 

Luigi


-- 

Flon's Law: 
There is not now, and never will be, a language in 
which it is the least bit difficult to write bad programs.