|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@gm...> - 2009-01-28 08:16:36
|
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 00:32 -0500, Joe Malicki wrote: > About a month ago I uploaded several patches to quantlib-swig to make > its coverage of QuantLib more complete (Tracker 2433245 and 2433147) > and had a few more speculative ones where the right solutions aren't > clear in the wings. > > Is there interest in making the SWIG bindings of QuantLib more > complete? Or is this not the right way to contribute? It's the right way. It's just that lately I haven't been able to find much time to apply the patches. Sorry for the delay. Luigi -- The first rule of intelligent tinkering is to save all the parts. -- Paul Erlich |