|
From: Joe M. <jma...@gm...> - 2009-01-28 05:32:11
|
About a month ago I uploaded several patches to quantlib-swig to make its coverage of QuantLib more complete (Tracker 2433245 and 2433147) and had a few more speculative ones where the right solutions aren't clear in the wings. Is there interest in making the SWIG bindings of QuantLib more complete? Or is this not the right way to contribute? Just curious for feedback, as I think this project is great and I'd like to give back a lot more - both to the SWIG port, because I tend to prefer to make the "higher level" program in Python for prototyping, experimentation, and integration with data sources etc., and the C++ with more models - but am wondering how to contribute? Thanks! Joe Malicki |