|
From: Piter D. <pit...@ma...> - 2008-10-23 01:24:03
|
<html><body><font size="3"><span style="font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"> <div>Nicolai,<br /></div><div><br /></div><div>>> what is the reasoning behind the fact <br />>> that one has to create a schedule (for coupons) and provide it to the bond <br />>> constructor, instead of providing the necessary information to the bond <br />>> constructor and then have it construct the needed schedule? <br /></div><div><br /></div><div>It is more generic and make easy to implement non regular cashflows. I could use it in a securitization product we had in my last job, for example. </div><div><br /></div>> I don't have access to the code right now, but if I remember right the <br />> input frequency is used in order to calculate the actual coupon <br />> payment from the coupon rate, and it might be different from the <br />> frequency used to calculate the yield,<br /><br /><div>This is the case for Brazil. We have the NTN-F public bond quoted at Annual Business/252 but whose coupon generation follows Annual 30/360.<br /><br /></div><div>Regards,<br /><br /><br /> </div></span></font></body></html> |