Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Refactored JavaRpc - JSONObject from json.org

[Jean-Baptiste B. -- N. <j-b...@no...>]

On Jun 29, 2009, at 18:13 , Andreas Junghans wrote:

> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Hi Andreas,

[CUT]
>
> Anyway, why are you so keen on replacing the low-level JSON lib on the
> Java side? What's wrong with the one from json.org? I'd say "never
> touch a running system" in this case, except there's something
> seriously wrong or missing from the json.org version.
>
In fact, you are right !
JavaRPC can be seen as 2 parts :
a. The RPC one : the servlet, the service and method call  
management, ...
b. The JSON<->Java serialization.

I'd like as a first step not to change anything and just use it but  
only a. works perftly for me and I encountered issues with b.

The big plan, for me, is the following :
1. Just use it and do things with it this summer
2. Write test, say in september
3. Think to refactor based on the experience of 1 with the security of  
2, say in october.

So, maybe, I'll start again from sracth with pure JavaRPC and report  
issue I have with b. here rather than trying to use it, refactor it at  
the same time :-)
For now, I'm sure some issue I had was due to my lack of knowledge of  
JavaRPC usage.

BTW, what about the transient Java keyword ? Are transient attributes  
excluded from json serialization ?