From: Andrea R. <ml...@ne...> - 2004-01-27 13:10:28
|
Hi folks, I've a problem with qmailadmin-1.2.0 (rc3) and TMDA. Normally, when I check the box "antispam filter", in the .qmail file I've this command: | maildrop /etc/mailfilter Because I've compiled qmailadmin with these options: --enable-modify-spam=Y --enable-spam-command="| maildrop /etc/mailfilter" Well, If add the TMDA to check the senders, I've to put on my .qmail this command on the first line: |preline -f /usr/local/tmda-1.0/bin/tmda-filter -c |/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain/me/.tmda/config The problem is: in my qmailadmin's web interface I see this line in the "forward" box, with the "save" check-box activated. Well, is this a problem without solution? Thanks for your support Regards Andrea |
From: Tom C. <to...@to...> - 2004-01-27 17:42:56
|
On Jan 25, 2004, at 4:25 AM, Andrea Riela wrote: > Well, If add the TMDA to check the senders, I've to put on my .qmail > this > command on the first line: > > |preline -f /usr/local/tmda-1.0/bin/tmda-filter -c > |/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain/me/.tmda/config > > The problem is: in my qmailadmin's web interface I see this line in the > "forward" box, with the "save" check-box activated. > > Well, is this a problem without solution? Yes, the 1.2.0 version of qmailadmin will not work with TMDA. We'd love to get a patch that adds a checkbox for TMDA filtering, but even if we don't, we plan to properly handle extra program delivery lines in .qmail files when we update the code in the 1.3.0 development series. -- Tom Collins - to...@to... QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ Info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/ |
From: Andrea R. <ml...@ne...> - 2004-01-28 01:48:03
|
> Yes, the 1.2.0 version of qmailadmin will not work with TMDA. We'd > love to get a patch that adds a checkbox for TMDA filtering, but even > if we don't, we plan to properly handle extra program > delivery lines in > .qmail files when we update the code in the 1.3.0 development series. I hope very soon :) TMDA is a very good thing vs. spam. Where in qmailadmin is the code about spamassassin checkbox? Thanks Andrea |
From: Rick W. <rw...@de...> - 2004-01-28 05:17:32
|
If my changes to QmailAdmin are accepted, it probably isn't worth you putting any effort into the older version. Handling .qmail files will be totally differrent when I get done. What I have in mind... If you select 'Standard' delivery then you can select various kinds of standard delivery from a dropdown list. One option would be "no .qmail file". If there are other choices, those choices are the names of files in a special directory. If you chose one of those template .qmail files, that file is passed through the template processor and the output becomes the .qmail file for that user. Instead of having to re-write the code to change the contents of the .qmail file, you create a template. QmailAdmin could come with a few pre-written templates, and the server owner could alter or add to them. I probably want one directory that affects all domains and another for each domain with the drop down list showing files in both the system wide and domain specific directories. Do you think you could work with that? Is this in addition to or instead of spam checking? Do you want to use TMDA with other delivery modes like Forward or Vacation? What does your .qmail file look like with TMDA enabled? Thanks, Rick Andrea Riela wrote: >>Yes, the 1.2.0 version of qmailadmin will not work with TMDA. We'd >>love to get a patch that adds a checkbox for TMDA filtering, but even >>if we don't, we plan to properly handle extra program >>delivery lines in >>.qmail files when we update the code in the 1.3.0 development series. > > > I hope very soon :) > TMDA is a very good thing vs. spam. > Where in qmailadmin is the code about spamassassin checkbox? > > Thanks > Andrea > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > qmailadmin-devel mailing list > qma...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmailadmin-devel > > |
From: Andrea R. <ml...@ne...> - 2004-01-28 09:00:21
|
> Is this in addition to or instead of spam checking? In addition. > Do you want to use TMDA with other delivery modes like > Forward or Vacation? Is better that the user could have tmda and Forward/Vacation > What does your .qmail file look like with TMDA enabled? My .qmail file working is that (ie: user 'test'; domain 'domain.dom'): |preline -f /usr/local/tmda-1.0/bin/tmda-filter -c /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.dom/test/.tmda/config | maildrop /etc/mailfilter Where mailfilter is a script to redirect spam to ab...@do...m, and others email to maildir. Well, I've in mind that the new qmailadmin could have these options: --enable-use-mda to the checkbox, for all the best message delivery agents (TMDA, and if you want qconfirm and ASK), and to the first configuration (mkdir .qconfirm or .tmda for example, with subdirectories, and so on). --enable-mda-command to put in your .qmail the specific command. The problem, in my opinion, is that: how qmailadmin interprets the .qmail file's top-down processing. What you're thinkin about? Thanks Andrea |