You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(75) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(46) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(1) |
2004 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(9) |
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2006 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(9) |
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(9) |
May
(11) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(10) |
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(5) |
2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(9) |
2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(5) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Larry N. <py...@bl...> - 2017-09-02 13:47:00
|
I'm seeing the same thing. Maybe the server is down? Nedry On 9/2/17 1:22 AM, Stephan Fourie wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am currently seeing 504 errors when attempting to connect to the > Pyzor service. When running 'pyzor ping' I see the following: > > public.pyzor.org:24441 (504, 'Reading response timed-out.') > > Anybody else experiencing the same issue? > > Thanks! > Stephan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > pyzor-users mailing list > pyz...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyzor-users |
From: Stephan F. <st...@fo...> - 2017-09-02 06:54:27
|
Hi everyone, I am currently seeing 504 errors when attempting to connect to the Pyzor service. When running 'pyzor ping' I see the following: public.pyzor.org:24441 (504, 'Reading response timed-out.') Anybody else experiencing the same issue? Thanks! Stephan |
From: Andre N. <an...@di...> - 2016-07-06 02:17:21
|
Thanks Tony! Best, Andre > Em 5 de jul de 2016, às 18:12, Tony Meyer <to...@sp...> escreveu: > > Hello, > >> Are there other IPs that can be used by the public pyzor server other >> than the one currently in use for public.pyzor.org? >> >> I'm just wondering if there's any other address I should allow in my >> output traffic policy. > > At this time, it’s just the current one. > > If any new ones get added, we’ll be sure to announce that on the website and here at least a couple of weeks before. > > Regards, > Tony > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San > Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries > present their vision of the future. This family event has something for > everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. > http://sdm.link/attshape > _______________________________________________ > pyzor-users mailing list > pyz...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyzor-users |
From: Tony M. <to...@sp...> - 2016-07-05 21:39:48
|
Hello, > Are there other IPs that can be used by the public pyzor server other > than the one currently in use for public.pyzor.org? > > I'm just wondering if there's any other address I should allow in my > output traffic policy. At this time, it’s just the current one. If any new ones get added, we’ll be sure to announce that on the website and here at least a couple of weeks before. Regards, Tony |
From: Andre N. <an...@di...> - 2016-06-15 13:36:03
|
Hello Are there other IPs that can be used by the public pyzor server other than the one currently in use for public.pyzor.org? I'm just wondering if there's any other address I should allow in my output traffic policy. Thanks in advance, Andre |
From: Tony M. <to...@sp...> - 2015-12-29 19:31:37
|
Hello, > Maybe someone has a solution for this? The solution is really to use a modern version of pyzor, if you’re going to be using public.pyzor.org (if you want to use your own server, then you can of course use whatever out-of-date and broken pyzor you like ;)). 0.5 is very out of date (0.6.1 was released April 2014, there have been five releases since then). You can pip install pyzor 1.0 anywhere you need to. It looks like no-one is maintaining the Debian package (since from what I can see even the latest Debian is using 0.5). If you care about that being updated rather than just installing from PyPI, then you’d need to find the previous maintainer or get a new one (I’m not familiar with how that process works). Regards, Tony |
From: Tony M. <to...@sp...> - 2015-12-29 11:54:52
|
Hello, > 1. How can I determine which message needs to be whitelisted on the > pyzor server with its digest? It’s the one that is getting rejected. If you are getting multiple different messages that have the same digest (`pyzor digest` will show you the digest, and `pyzor info` will show you the results) then there’s an improvement needed to the digesting algorithm to avoid that. It would be really useful if it was possible to include some examples in an issue on https://github.com/SpamExperts/pyzor/issues > 2. If I´ll do the workaround and whitelist the admin-mail-address > locally, will the "listed on pyzor" spamassassin message be cleared (if > the related mail was sent from this account)? Someone else here may know the answer to this, but it’s really a SA question rather than a Pyzor one. Regards, Tony |
From: Thomas B. <be...@sp...> - 2015-12-28 12:59:44
|
Thanks a lot for your fast answer. I have 2 follow-up questions. 1. How can I determine which message needs to be whitelisted on the pyzor server with its digest? 2. If I´ll do the workaround and whitelist the admin-mail-address locally, will the "listed on pyzor" spamassassin message be cleared (if the related mail was sent from this account)? Thanks for your help. Ben Am 2015-12-28 13:19, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: > On 28.12.15 11:28, Thomas Bennek wrote: >> I´m very new to pyzor, but I know, that pyzor won´t blacklist IPs, >> Addresses, Domains or Servers - it is only about the content. >> >> But it seems that I´m listed on pyzor and, I´ve read about >> whitelisting >> a digest, but I´m not sure which message has been reported and why. >> I´m >> very sure that no Spam-Mail has been sent from my server, so I assume >> it >> is a "logcheck" message as I´ve read in the mailing list before. But >> I´m >> not sure what I need to do to get "unlisted". > > you need account on pyzor server to be able to whitelist checksum of a > mail. > >> Do I need to locally >> whitelist the admin-mail address of my server which sends the logcheck >> mails? > > this is the recommended workaround. |
From: Matus U. - f. <uh...@fa...> - 2015-12-28 12:19:34
|
On 28.12.15 11:28, Thomas Bennek wrote: >I´m very new to pyzor, but I know, that pyzor won´t blacklist IPs, >Addresses, Domains or Servers - it is only about the content. > >But it seems that I´m listed on pyzor and, I´ve read about whitelisting >a digest, but I´m not sure which message has been reported and why. I´m >very sure that no Spam-Mail has been sent from my server, so I assume it >is a "logcheck" message as I´ve read in the mailing list before. But I´m >not sure what I need to do to get "unlisted". you need account on pyzor server to be able to whitelist checksum of a mail. > Do I need to locally >whitelist the admin-mail address of my server which sends the logcheck >mails? this is the recommended workaround. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fa... ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. REALITY.SYS corrupted. Press any key to reboot Universe. |
From: Thomas B. <be...@sp...> - 2015-12-28 10:40:39
|
Hello to everyone, I´m very new to pyzor, but I know, that pyzor won´t blacklist IPs, Addresses, Domains or Servers - it is only about the content. But it seems that I´m listed on pyzor and, I´ve read about whitelisting a digest, but I´m not sure which message has been reported and why. I´m very sure that no Spam-Mail has been sent from my server, so I assume it is a "logcheck" message as I´ve read in the mailing list before. But I´m not sure what I need to do to get "unlisted". Do I need to locally whitelist the admin-mail address of my server which sends the logcheck mails? Any help would be appreciated, and sorry for my noobish question ;-) Thanks, Ben |
From: Tony M. <to...@sp...> - 2015-11-18 21:00:44
|
Hello, A disk on the main public.pyzor.org server needs to be replaced (a different one than last time), so there will again be a short downtime of the public server, sorry. The replacement is scheduled for the 19th of November 2015, 06:00 UTC, and should take no more than 30 minutes (likely about half of that). We apologise for any inconvenience! Regards, Tony |
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2015-10-20 19:05:10
|
Hi, We're replacing a faulty SSD disk tomorrow Oct 21 at 7am CEST, so the public server may be shortly unreachable. Kind regards, Dreas |
From: Julian Pilfold-B. <jp...@bo...> - 2015-10-13 12:09:07
|
Hi All, I have Pyzor 1.0.0-5 running with spamassassin 3.4.0 and amavisd 2.10 on Centos 7, but it keeps hanging and dropping messages into the maillog as below: [root@mail spamassassin]# tail -f /var/log/maillog | grep TERMINATED Oct 13 11:42:19 mail amavis[15850]: (15850-19) SA info: pyzor: [18062] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) Oct 13 11:42:56 mail amavis[17804]: (17804-04) SA info: pyzor: [18348] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) Oct 13 11:42:59 mail amavis[18079]: (18079-01) SA info: pyzor: [18363] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) Oct 13 11:43:20 mail amavis[17804]: (17804-05) SA info: pyzor: [18471] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) Oct 13 11:43:32 mail amavis[18079]: (18079-02) SA info: pyzor: [18497] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) Oct 13 11:43:34 mail amavis[17804]: (17804-06) SA info: pyzor: [18560] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) Oct 13 11:43:46 mail amavis[18079]: (18079-03) SA info: pyzor: [18664] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) Oct 13 11:44:06 mail amavis[17804]: (17804-07) SA info: pyzor: [18731] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) Oct 13 11:44:20 mail amavis[18079]: (18079-04) SA info: pyzor: [18811] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) Oct 13 11:44:42 mail amavis[17804]: (17804-08) SA info: pyzor: [18854] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) This happens with every message that is scanned and as a result, I have about 8000 messages from OSSEC sitting in my mailbox reporting: OSSEC HIDS Notification. 2015 Oct 13 12:01:18 Received From: mail->/var/log/maillog Rule: 1002 fired (level 2) -> "Unknown problem somewhere in the system." Portion of the log(s): Oct 13 12:01:16 mail amavis[20676]: (20676-16) SA info: pyzor: [24210] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) --END OF NOTIFICATION The odd this is that the log entry in the mail delivery includes a pyzor score: check_spf: 0.37 (0.0%), check_razor2: 687 (13.8%), check_pyzor: 4003 (80.6%), tests_pri_500: 4.1 (0.1%) and running a check on pyzor looks successful: [root@mail pyzor-0.7.0]# echo “test” | spamassassin -D pyzor 2>&1 | less Oct 13 12:40:53.331 [4129] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor Oct 13 12:40:54.762 [4129] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor Oct 13 12:40:54.763 [4129] dbg: pyzor: opening pipe: /usr/bin/pyzor --homedir /etc/mail/spamassassin/.pyzor check < /tmp/.spamassassin41294pGoxztmp Oct 13 12:40:59.895 [4129] dbg: pyzor: [4137] finished: exit 1 Oct 13 12:40:59.895 [4129] dbg: pyzor: got response: public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') 416441 49282 Oct 13 12:40:59.896 [4129] dbg: pyzor: listed: COUNT=416441/5 WHITELIST=49282 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bordengrammar.kent.sch.uk X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: *********** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.9 required=5.0 tests=EMPTY_MESSAGE,FSL_BULK_SIG, MISSING_DATE,MISSING_FROM,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MID,MISSING_SUBJECT, NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,PYZOR_CHECK autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP * 1.0 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header * 2.5 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/) * 0.5 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header * 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header * 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no * Subject: text * 1.0 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header * 1.4 FSL_BULK_SIG Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe * -0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers * 1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header * 0.0 NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE Message appears to be missing most RFC-822 * headers “test” Subject: [SPAM] X-Spam-Prev-Subject: (nonexistent) So my question is, bar whitelisting the error from OSSec, has anyone got any idea what could be causing it and how to fix? Thanks, Julian -- Borden Grammar School, Avenue of Remembrance, Sittingbourne, Kent, ME10 4DB. Tel: 01795 424192 **************************************************************************** This e-mail is from Borden Grammar School Trust. This e-mail, together with any files transmitted with it, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised dissemination or copying of this e-mail or its attachments, and any use or disclosure of any information contained in them, is strictly prohibited, and may also be illegal. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or relay this e-mail. Please note that any views expressed by an individual within this e-mail, do not necessarily reflect the views of the Borden Grammar School Trust. Borden Grammar School Trust has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail, the Academy cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail and/or files attached. Registered office: Borden Grammar School, Avenue of Remembrance, Sittingbourne, Kent, ME10 4DB Registered in England: 07827591 . |
From: Jordan G. <jo...@t1...> - 2015-08-12 23:48:55
|
Thanks for your quick reply Marius; I figured it out shortly after I sent the message :) Best, Jordan From: mar...@gm... [mailto:mar...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 3:13 PM To: Jordan Goldman; pyz...@li... Subject: RE: Delisting help Hi Jordan, Pyzor works on message content. It doesn’t include (blacklist/whitelist) any server, ip, sender, domain etc. echo "3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840" | pyzor check -s digests public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 Test a different (normal) message and you should get zeros: Step 1 pyzor digest < normal-message.eml 000… …000 Step 2 echo "000… …000" | pyzor check -s digests public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') 0 0 Regards, Marius From: Jordan Goldman Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 1:02 AM To: pyz...@li... <mailto:pyz...@li...> Subject: Delisting help Hi all, First, I apologize for having to send this to the mailing list, but I couldn’t find an alternate method of support. The forum link on the project page (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php) is broken. My email server appears to be listed in Pyzor and submitting a whitelist request results in “Digest does not match message” every time, even though I’m submitting the digest for the exact raw email that I’m attaching. How can I go about getting delisted? My email server is t16.net. # cat email.txt | pyzor digest 3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840 # pyzor digest < email.txt 3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840 email.txt is exactly what I’m uploading in the whitelist form. I appreciate any help you all can offer. Thanks! |
From: <mar...@gm...> - 2015-08-12 22:12:43
|
Hi Jordan, Pyzor works on message content. It doesn’t include (blacklist/whitelist) any server, ip, sender, domain etc. echo "3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840" | pyzor check -s digests public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 Test a different (normal) message and you should get zeros: Step 1 pyzor digest < normal-message.eml 000… …000 Step 2 echo "000… …000" | pyzor check -s digests public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') 0 0 Regards, Marius From: Jordan Goldman Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 1:02 AM To: pyz...@li... Subject: Delisting help Hi all, First, I apologize for having to send this to the mailing list, but I couldn’t find an alternate method of support. The forum link on the project page (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php) is broken. My email server appears to be listed in Pyzor and submitting a whitelist request results in “Digest does not match message” every time, even though I’m submitting the digest for the exact raw email that I’m attaching. How can I go about getting delisted? My email server is t16.net. # cat email.txt | pyzor digest 3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840 # pyzor digest < email.txt 3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840 email.txt is exactly what I’m uploading in the whitelist form. I appreciate any help you all can offer. Thanks! |
From: Jordan G. <jo...@t1...> - 2015-08-12 22:03:27
|
Please disregard - I was misunderstanding how Pyzor works. The content of my test email was simply "test email", which I suppose was tripping the spam detector. Sending a real email solves it. Thanks From: Jordan Goldman [mailto:jo...@t1...] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 2:43 PM To: 'pyz...@li...' Subject: Delisting help Hi all, First, I apologize for having to send this to the mailing list, but I couldn't find an alternate method of support. The forum link on the project page (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php) is broken. My email server appears to be listed in Pyzor and submitting a whitelist request results in "Digest does not match message" every time, even though I'm submitting the digest for the exact raw email that I'm attaching. How can I go about getting delisted? My email server is t16.net. # cat email.txt | pyzor digest 3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840 # pyzor digest < email.txt 3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840 email.txt is exactly what I'm uploading in the whitelist form. I appreciate any help you all can offer. Thanks! |
From: Jordan G. <jo...@t1...> - 2015-08-12 22:01:30
|
Hi all, First, I apologize for having to send this to the mailing list, but I couldn't find an alternate method of support. The forum link on the project page (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php) is broken. My email server appears to be listed in Pyzor and submitting a whitelist request results in "Digest does not match message" every time, even though I'm submitting the digest for the exact raw email that I'm attaching. How can I go about getting delisted? My email server is t16.net. # cat email.txt | pyzor digest 3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840 # pyzor digest < email.txt 3656cfdbe2819b0565e8765877913ad77a347840 email.txt is exactly what I'm uploading in the whitelist form. I appreciate any help you all can offer. Thanks! |
From: Marius G. <mar...@gm...> - 2015-06-25 10:28:31
|
Makes sense. Thank you. Marius -----Original Message----- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fa...] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 1:15 PM To: pyz...@li... Subject: Re: Custom Pyzor rules with different servers On 25.06.15 12:35, Marius Gologan wrote: >I would like to know if is possible to create custom Pzyor rules with >different servers. thay are spamassassin rules and should be discussed in spamassassin mailing list. >full PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC >eval:check_pyzor(public.pyzor.org:24441) you don't have to redefine standard SA rule. >full PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL >eval:check_pyzor(localhost:24441) you can add this one ># If multiple servers return fingerprint, mark message as spam. > >meta PYZOR_CHECK_MATCH >PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC && PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL ... and this one as well. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fa... ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o _______________________________________________ pyzor-users mailing list pyz...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyzor-users |
From: Matus U. - f. <uh...@fa...> - 2015-06-25 10:14:55
|
On 25.06.15 12:35, Marius Gologan wrote: >I would like to know if is possible to create custom Pzyor rules with >different servers. thay are spamassassin rules and should be discussed in spamassassin mailing list. >full PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC >eval:check_pyzor(public.pyzor.org:24441) you don't have to redefine standard SA rule. >full PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL >eval:check_pyzor(localhost:24441) you can add this one ># If multiple servers return fingerprint, mark message as spam. > >meta PYZOR_CHECK_MATCH >PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC && PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL ... and this one as well. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fa... ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. |
From: Marius G. <mar...@gm...> - 2015-06-25 09:35:20
|
Hi, I would like to know if is possible to create custom Pzyor rules with different servers. The scope is to have different scores and even different meta rules, depending on the server used. Here is an example of what I have in mind: # Disabled default rule score PYZOR_CHECK 0 # Recreate and enable default rule full PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC eval:check_pyzor(public.pyzor.org:24441) describe PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC Listed in Public Pyzor tflags PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC net score PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC 1.4 reuse PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC # Create an additional rule full PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL eval:check_pyzor(localhost:24441) describe PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL Listed in Local Pyzor tflags PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL net score PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL 1.4 reuse PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL # If multiple servers return fingerprint, mark message as spam. meta PYZOR_CHECK_MATCH PYZOR_CHECK_PUBLIC && PYZOR_CHECK_LOCAL describe PYZOR_CHECK_MATCH Listed in multiple Pyzor score PYZOR_CHECK_MATCH 5.0 Thank you. Marius Gologan. |
From: Tony T. <Ton...@go...> - 2015-06-02 22:30:45
|
We have been using Pyzor with SpamAssassin and Postfix, and I notice that a lot of the spam that gets through 'untagged' is correctly detected if I manually re-scan them. I'm assuming the difference is the time it takes for me to notice and test those spam. I also notice that we get a lot of duplicate spam to current employees (mostly senior mgmt/owners) as well as long-gone employees. So I would really like to setup an additional local Pyzor server and train it with email from the long-gone employees. The goal is to immediately identify spam rather than waiting on the public servers to update. But I have not been able to find any HOWTO's for such a setup. Can someone please help me? I think the general procedure would be: 1. Install pyzor server 2. Create rule in Postfix or SA to redirect known-bad messages (based on old-old-old addresses) to a separate instance of Pyzor client 3. This second copy of Pyzor client would be configured to 'report' all messages it receives to the local Pyzor server 4. Update the existing primary Pyzor client to perform lookups against the local Pyzor server, either in addition to or instead of the public. Unfortunately, I really only know how to do the first step. - Tony |
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2015-02-16 09:26:09
|
Hi, This should have been resolved already. We've migrated the public infrastructure to new (faster) hardware, and upgraded the underlying software. Unfortunately an issue occurred as part of that process, it has been resolved and the server should be working well now. Apologies for the inconvenience caused. Warm regards, Dreas On 15-02-15 11:10, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > Just a quick note to let everyone know: The public.pyzor.org server is > essentially dead since yesterday morning. > |
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2015-02-15 10:27:16
|
Just a quick note to let everyone know: The public.pyzor.org server is essentially dead since yesterday morning. -- -- Andreas AKA the pyzor monitor |
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2014-11-25 22:08:23
|
Hi, On 25-11-14 19:22, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > All 4 public pyzor servers are timing out since several hours (not > always but almost always). That should be much better as of now. Regards, Dreas |
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2014-11-25 18:22:23
|
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, at 16:04, Sistemas Operacionais Unix wrote: > We've opened the outbound port 24441 TCP and UDP in the firewall. TCP shouldn't be needed. > There's any other port that should be opened? Not that I know of. However, today is not a good day for testing: All 4 public pyzor servers are timing out since several hours (not always but almost always). -- -- Andreas :-) |